Anne S. Berry

2.1k total citations
38 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Anne S. Berry is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne S. Berry has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 6 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Anne S. Berry's work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (10 papers). Anne S. Berry is often cited by papers focused on Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (10 papers). Anne S. Berry collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Anne S. Berry's co-authors include Cindy Lustig, Martin Sarter, William J. Jagust, Adam Gazzaley, Wesley C. Clapp, Theodore P. Zanto, William M. Howe, Vyoma D. Shah, Joseph L. Hardy and Henry W. Mahncke and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.

In The Last Decade

Anne S. Berry

37 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Anne S. Berry

CMN

PMH

ECP

Giulio Pergola Italy

Jie Fan China

Josef B. Aldenhoff Germany

Jared X. Van Snellenberg United States

David Elmenhorst Germany

Elisabeth A. T. Evers Netherlands

Diana Prata United Kingdom

Patrick A. Randall United States

Nao J. Gamo United States

Giulio Pergola Italy

Anne S. Berry

902 ×1.1

233 ×0.8

CMN

214 ×0.9

PMH

192 ×0.8

236 ×1.3

ECP

Citations per year, relative to Anne S. Berry Anne S. Berry (= 1×) peers Giulio Pergola

Countries citing papers authored by Anne S. Berry

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne S. Berry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne S. Berry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne S. Berry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne S. Berry

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne S. Berry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne S. Berry. The network helps show where Anne S. Berry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne S. Berry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne S. Berry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne S. Berry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne S. Berry. Anne S. Berry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Crawford, Jennifer L. & Anne S. Berry. (2024). Examining resilience to Alzheimer’s disease through the lens of monoaminergic neuromodulator systems. Trends in Neurosciences. 47(11). 892–903. 2 indexed citations

Cassady, Kaitlin, et al.. (2024). Pathological and neurochemical correlates of locus coeruleus functional network activity. Biological Psychology. 192. 108847–108847. 1 indexed citations

Prakash, Ruchika Shaurya, Michael R. McKenna, James T. C. Teng, et al.. (2024). A whole‐brain functional connectivity model of Alzheimer's disease pathology. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 21(1). e14349–e14349. 2 indexed citations

LaPoint, Molly R., et al.. (2023). Poorer aging trajectories are associated with elevated serotonin synthesis capacity. Molecular Psychiatry. 28(10). 4390–4398. 4 indexed citations

Joie, Renaud La, et al.. (2023). DAT1 and BDNF polymorphisms interact to predict Aβ and tau pathology. Neurobiology of Aging. 133. 115–124. 3 indexed citations

Dahl, Martin J., Dorothea Hämmerer, Anne Maaß, et al.. (2023). Interactive effects of locus coeruleus structure and catecholamine synthesis capacity on cognitive function. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 15. 1236335–1236335. 7 indexed citations

Harrison, Theresa M., Matthew J. Betts, Anne Maaß, et al.. (2022). Associations among locus coeruleus catecholamines, tau pathology, and memory in aging. Neuropsychopharmacology. 47(5). 1106–1113. 31 indexed citations

Silvestrini, Nicolas, Sebastian Musslick, Anne S. Berry, & Eliana Vassena. (2022). An integrative effort: Bridging motivational intensity theory and recent neurocomputational and neuronal models of effort and control allocation.. Psychological Review. 130(4). 1081–1103. 34 indexed citations

Harrison, Theresa M., Jenna N. Adams, Matthew J. Betts, et al.. (2022). Locus coeruleus catecholamines link neuroticism and vulnerability to tau pathology in aging. NeuroImage. 263. 119658–119658. 8 indexed citations

10.

Berry, Anne S., Robert L. White, Daniella J. Furman, et al.. (2019). Dopaminergic Mechanisms Underlying Normal Variation in Trait Anxiety. Journal of Neuroscience. 39(14). 2735–2744. 47 indexed citations

11.

Xie, Weizhen, Anne S. Berry, Cindy Lustig, Patricia J. Deldin, & Weiwei Zhang. (2019). Poor Sleep Quality and Compromised Visual Working Memory Capacity. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 25(6). 583–594. 39 indexed citations

12.

Sescousse, Guillaume, Romain Ligneul, Ruth J. van Holst, et al.. (2018). Spontaneous eye blink rate and dopamine synthesis capacity: preliminary evidence for an absence of positive correlation. European Journal of Neuroscience. 47(9). 1081–1086. 57 indexed citations

13.

Berry, Anne S., Vyoma D. Shah, Daniella J. Furman, et al.. (2017). Dopamine Synthesis Capacity is Associated with D2/3 Receptor Binding but Not Dopamine Release. Neuropsychopharmacology. 43(6). 1201–1211. 36 indexed citations

14.

Berry, Anne S., Vyoma D. Shah, Suzanne L. Baker, et al.. (2016). Aging Affects Dopaminergic Neural Mechanisms of Cognitive Flexibility. Journal of Neuroscience. 36(50). 12559–12569. 112 indexed citations

15.

Sarter, Martin, Cindy Lustig, Anne S. Berry, et al.. (2016). What do phasic cholinergic signals do?. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 130. 135–141. 43 indexed citations

16.

Berry, Anne S., Randy Blakely, Martin Sarter, & Cindy Lustig. (2014). Cholinergic capacity mediates prefrontal engagement during challenges to attention: evidence from imaging genetics. NeuroImage. 108. 386–395. 37 indexed citations

17.

Berry, Anne S., Theodore P. Zanto, Wesley C. Clapp, et al.. (2010). The Influence of Perceptual Training on Working Memory in Older Adults. PLoS ONE. 5(7). e11537–e11537. 183 indexed citations

18.

Mazaheri, Ali, Sharon Coffey‐Corina, George R. Mangun, et al.. (2010). Functional Disconnection of Frontal Cortex and Visual Cortex in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 67(7). 617–623. 130 indexed citations

19.

Berry, Anne S., Theodore P. Zanto, Aaron M. Rutman, Wesley C. Clapp, & Adam Gazzaley. (2009). Practice-Related Improvement in Working Memory is Modulated by Changes in Processing External Interference. Journal of Neurophysiology. 102(3). 1779–1789. 48 indexed citations

20.

Zhang, Wei, Anne S. Berry, & Christopher M. M. Franco. (2001). An improved procedure for characterization of spatial and temporal evolution of immobilized cells in gel membranes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 56(5-6). 693–699. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact