Anne Parry
About
In The Last Decade
Anne Parry
5 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Molecular Biology 236
- Hematology 168
- Oncology 81
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 77
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 49
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Parry
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Parry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Parry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Parry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Parry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Parry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Parry. The network helps show where Anne Parry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Parry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Parry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Parry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Parry. Anne Parry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 197 | |
| 2 | 84 | |
| 3 | Phase-II study of the new aza-anthracenedione, BBR 2778, in patients with relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. | 41 |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.