Anne M. Lynch

163 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers

Anne M. Lynch
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 1.4k
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 1.3k
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 782
  • Immunology 743
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 728
Replace Carolyn Drews‐Botsch with:
Carolyn Drews‐Botsch United States
Babak Khoshnood France
Kevin McGeechan Australia
Graeme N. Smith Canada
Benjamin E. Leiby United States
Michael R. DeBaun United States
Meenakshi Jolly United States
Pierre‐Yves Ancel France
Mikkel Z. Oestergaard Switzerland
Rajesh Narwal United States
Anne M. Lynch relative to Carolyn Drews‐Botsch United States Carolyn Drews‐Botsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.9×
Carolyn Drews‐Botsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne M. Lynch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne M. Lynch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne M. Lynch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne M. Lynch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne M. Lynch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne M. Lynch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne M. Lynch. The network helps show where Anne M. Lynch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne M. Lynch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne M. Lynch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne M. Lynch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne M. Lynch. Anne M. Lynch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 4
4 7
5 0
6 40
7 3
8 16
9
Comparison of Refractive Prediction for Intraoperative Aberrometry and Barrett True K No History Formula in Cataract Surgery Patients with Prior Radial Keratotomy
1
10
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Controls
0
11
Ocular Comorbidities as Risk Factors for Refractive Surprise Following Cataract Surgery
0
12 11
13 42
14 33
15 26
16 197
17 49
18 25
19 89
20 3

About Anne M. Lynch

Anne M. Lynch is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 175 papers that have together received 4.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (42 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (33 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (30 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (1.3k citations), Ophthalmology (641 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.4k citations). Anne M. Lynch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Jane E. Salmon, Susmita Kashikar‐Zuck, Brandie D. Wagner, Jennifer L. Patnaik, V. Michael Holers, Alan G. Palestine, Jean E. Dumas, Ronald S. Gibbs, Patricia C. Giclas and David E. Miller. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Investigation and Nature Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026