Anne M. Doherty

2.1k citations
96 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Anne M. Doherty

85 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Anne M. Doherty
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Clinical Psychology 358
  • Family Practice 31
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 89
  • Social Psychology 200
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 147
Replace Lesley Stafford with:
Lesley Stafford Australia
Jaume Aguado Spain
Sinikka Sihvo Finland
Mehran Zarghami Iran
Jessica L. Browne Australia
David Kelley United States
Rikinkumar S. Patel United States
Adrian Dunlop Australia
Lars P. Hölzel Germany
Margit Kriegbaum Denmark
Anne M. Doherty relative to Lesley Stafford Australia Lesley Stafford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Lesley Stafford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anne M. Doherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne M. Doherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne M. Doherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne M. Doherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne M. Doherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne M. Doherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne M. Doherty. The network helps show where Anne M. Doherty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anne M. Doherty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anne M. Doherty Line = papers co-authored together Anne M. Doherty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20240
3 20242
4 20240
5 20240
6 20244
7 20211
8 20214
9 20211
10 202110
11 202119
12 20200
13 20202
14 201918
15 201816
16 201723
17 201421
18 201111
19
Flagship stores as a market entry method : perspectives from luxury fashion retailing
20061
20 20032

About Anne M. Doherty

Anne M. Doherty is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 96 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (10 papers), Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (9 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (8 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers) and Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (358 citations), Family Practice (31 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (89 citations), Social Psychology (200 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (147 citations). Anne M. Doherty has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Fiona Gaughran, Jose C. A. Carvalho, Kristi Downey, Patricia Casey, Brendan D. Kelly, Joseph Keane, John Cooney, Colm McDonald, John R. Kelly and Eamonn O’Leary. Their work appears in journals such as Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine, European Psychiatry, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, BJPsych Open and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026