Anne L. Averill

1.4k total citations
49 papers, 996 citations indexed

About

Anne L. Averill is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne L. Averill has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 996 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Insect Science, 29 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 20 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Anne L. Averill's work include Plant and animal studies (25 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (20 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers). Anne L. Averill is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (25 papers), Forest Insect Ecology and Management (20 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (18 papers). Anne L. Averill collaborates with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Anne L. Averill's co-authors include Ronald J. Prokopy, Erik J. Wenninger, Sylvia S. Cooley, Wendell L. Roelofs, Mark S. Sisterson, W. H. Reissig, K. MacKenzie, Geoffrey S. Rule, Cesar Rodriguez‐Saona and Hans T. Alborn and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Ecology and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Anne L. Averill

47 papers receiving 887 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne L. Averill United States 18 785 523 302 270 175 49 996
D. A. Downie United States 18 525 0.7× 481 0.9× 186 0.6× 267 1.0× 254 1.5× 28 882
Murray J. Fletcher Australia 16 455 0.6× 408 0.8× 114 0.4× 494 1.8× 160 0.9× 92 867
E. Richard Hoebeke United States 14 538 0.7× 292 0.6× 426 1.4× 192 0.7× 161 0.9× 80 782
Viktor Markó Hungary 19 683 0.9× 581 1.1× 171 0.6× 317 1.2× 177 1.0× 60 941
Paul W. Schaefer United States 17 736 0.9× 487 0.9× 276 0.9× 258 1.0× 310 1.8× 82 1.0k
Erik J. Wenninger United States 20 831 1.1× 302 0.6× 128 0.4× 906 3.4× 101 0.6× 57 1.3k
Hannah Nadel United States 19 768 1.0× 435 0.8× 282 0.9× 419 1.6× 137 0.8× 49 1.0k
J. Lévieux France 15 357 0.5× 334 0.6× 298 1.0× 174 0.6× 198 1.1× 40 664
Teresinha Vinha Zanuncio Brazil 22 1.1k 1.5× 883 1.7× 330 1.1× 399 1.5× 221 1.3× 102 1.4k
Brian T. Sullivan United States 22 958 1.2× 192 0.4× 927 3.1× 180 0.7× 283 1.6× 73 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Anne L. Averill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne L. Averill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne L. Averill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne L. Averill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne L. Averill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne L. Averill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne L. Averill. The network helps show where Anne L. Averill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne L. Averill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne L. Averill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne L. Averill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne L. Averill. Anne L. Averill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Rodriguez‐Saona, Cesar, et al.. (2020). Fine‐tuning the composition of the cranberry weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) aggregation pheromone. Journal of Applied Entomology. 144(5). 417–421. 5 indexed citations
3.
Averill, Anne L., et al.. (2018). Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Foraging on American Cranberry in Massachusetts. Northeastern Naturalist. 25(3). 502–512. 6 indexed citations
4.
Xu, Guang, et al.. (2017). Triplex real-time PCR for detection of Crithidia mellificae and Lotmaria passim in honey bees. Parasitology Research. 117(2). 623–628. 27 indexed citations
5.
Buonaccorsi, John P., et al.. (2013). Impact of Early Season Apical Meristem Injury by Gall Inducing Tipworm (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on Reproductive and Vegetative Growth of Cranberry. Journal of Economic Entomology. 106(3). 1339–1348. 10 indexed citations
6.
Szendrei, Zsofia, Anne L. Averill, Hans T. Alborn, & Cesar Rodriguez‐Saona. (2011). Identification and Field Evaluation of Attractants for the Cranberry Weevil, Anthonomus musculus Say. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 37(4). 387–397. 32 indexed citations
7.
Teixeira, Luı́s & Anne L. Averill. (2006). Evaluation of Flooding for Cultural Control of <I>Sparganothis sulfureana</I> (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Cranberry Bogs. Environmental Entomology. 35(3). 670–675. 12 indexed citations
8.
Robbins, Paul S., Aijun Zhang, Anne L. Averill, et al.. (2006). Sex Pheromone of the Cranberry Root Grub Lichnanthe vulpina. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 32(8). 1663–72. 4 indexed citations
9.
Sisterson, Mark S. & Anne L. Averill. (2004). Coevolution across landscapes: a spatially explicit model of parasitoid-host coevolution. Evolutionary Ecology. 18(1). 29–49. 7 indexed citations
10.
Zhang, Aijun, Paul S. Robbins, Anne L. Averill, et al.. (2003). Identification of the Female-Produced Sex Pheromone of the Scarab Beetle, Hoplia equina. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 29(7). 1635–1642. 15 indexed citations
11.
Sisterson, Mark S. & Anne L. Averill. (2003). Interactions between parasitized and unparasitized conspecifics: parasitoids modulate competitive dynamics. Oecologia. 135(3). 362–371. 16 indexed citations
12.
Hu, Xing Ping, Ronald J. Prokopy, & Anne L. Averill. (1999). Effects of pH on feeding responses in the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae). Journal of Insect Physiology. 45(2). 151–157. 5 indexed citations
13.
Averill, Anne L., et al.. (1996). Effects of recent experience on foraging in tephritid fruit flies. Journal of Insect Behavior. 9(4). 571–583. 7 indexed citations
14.
MacKenzie, K. & Anne L. Averill. (1995). Bee (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) Diversity and Abundance on Cranberry in Southeastern Massachusetts. Annals of the Entomological Society of America. 88(3). 334–341. 18 indexed citations
15.
Averill, Anne L. & Ronald J. Prokopy. (1993). Foraging of Rhagoletis pomonella flies in relation to interactive food and fruit resources. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 66(2). 179–185. 12 indexed citations
16.
Averill, Anne L., E. Bowdan, & Ronald J. Prokopy. (1987). Acid rain affects egg-laying behavior of apple maggot flies. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 43(8). 939–942. 5 indexed citations
17.
Averill, Anne L. & Ronald J. Prokopy. (1987). Residual activity of oviposition-deterring pheromone inRhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae) and female response to infested fruit. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 13(1). 167–177. 35 indexed citations
18.
Averill, Anne L. & Ronald J. Prokopy. (1987). Intraspecific Competition in the Tephritid Fruit Fly Rhagoletis Pomonella. Ecology. 68(4). 878–886. 124 indexed citations
19.
Prokopy, Ronald J., et al.. (1982). Associative Learning in Egglaying Site Selection by Apple Maggot Flies. Science. 218(4567). 76–77. 127 indexed citations
20.
Prokopy, Ronald J., Anne L. Averill, E. Bowdan, et al.. (1982). Site of production of an oviposition-deterring pheromone component in Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Journal of Insect Physiology. 28(1). 1–10. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026