Annabel Cormack

563 citations
14 papers · 131 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Annabel Cormack

13 papers receiving 108 citations

Peers

Annabel Cormack
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Language and Linguistics 95
  • Linguistics and Language 19
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 32
  • Artificial Intelligence 63
  • Philosophy 18
Replace Antje Roßdeutscher with:
Antje Roßdeutscher Germany
Frank Vlach United States
T. R. Rapoport Israel
Ljiliana Progovac United States
Thomas E. Hukari Canada
Luis Cuadrado de Vicente Germany
John Frampton United States
Ingrid Kaufmann Germany
Alessandro Zucchi United States
Lars Hellan Norway
Annabel Cormack relative to Antje Roßdeutscher Germany Antje Roßdeutscher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Antje Roßdeutscher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annabel Cormack

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabel Cormack's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabel Cormack with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabel Cormack more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabel Cormack

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabel Cormack. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabel Cormack. The network helps show where Annabel Cormack may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Annabel Cormack, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annabel Cormack Line = papers co-authored together Annabel Cormack links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 20180
2
FEATURES FROM ASPECTS VIA THE MINIMALIST PROGRAM TO COMBINATORY CATEGORIAL GRAMMAR
20152
3 20061
4 200315
5 200016
6
Definitions: Implications for Syntax, Semantics, and the Language of Thought
19987
7
Negation, polarity and V positions in English
19989
8
Checking theory: features, functional heads, and checking-parameters *
19965
9 19951
10 19873
11 19824
12 198161
13
On 'Formal Games and Forms for Games'
19806
14 19651

About Annabel Cormack

Annabel Cormack is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 131 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (10 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (4 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (3 papers), Historical Linguistics and Language Studies (2 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (1 paper), Digital Games and Media (1 paper) and Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (95 citations), Linguistics and Language (19 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 citations), Artificial Intelligence (63 citations) and Philosophy (18 citations). Annabel Cormack has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ruth Kempson and Neil Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Linguistics and Philosophy, Lingua, Studia Linguistica, Transactions of the Philological Society and The Computer Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026