Anna Williams

4.5k citations
76 papers · 2.0k indexed · h-index 25

Anna Williams

71 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Anna Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Research and Theory 73
  • General Health Professions 1.0k
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 133
  • Pharmacy 128
  • Emergency Medical Services 168
Replace Saras Henderson with:
Saras Henderson Australia
Connie M. Ulrich United States
Louise Hall United Kingdom
Alireza Nikbakht Nasrabadi Iran
Masoud Bahrami Iran
Marja Kaunonen Finland
Jan Angus Canada
Bronwynne C. Evans United States
Mary Carolan Australia
Adelaida Zabalegui Spain
Anna Williams relative to Saras Henderson Australia Saras Henderson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.6×
Saras Henderson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Williams. The network helps show where Anna Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Williams Line = papers co-authored together Anna Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20251
4 20244
5 20241
6 202317
7 202311
8 20229
9 202220
10 20229
11 202164
12 202126
13 202116
14 202120
15 202113
16 20217
17 202142
18 202094
19 2020183
20 201313

About Anna Williams

Anna Williams is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Emergency Medical Services, Pharmacy, General Health Professions and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Health Workforce Issues (9 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (9 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (8 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (7 papers), COVID-19 and healthcare impacts (7 papers), Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention (7 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (73 citations), General Health Professions (1.0k citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (133 citations), Pharmacy (128 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (168 citations). Anna Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gawaine Powell Davies, Mark Harris, Elizabeth Halcomb, Susan McInnes, Kaara Ray B. Calma, Christine Ashley, Catherine Stephen, Sharon James, Nicholas Zwar and Alison Twycross. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Nursing Management, Journal of Clinical Nursing and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026