Anna V. Agranovich

461 total citations
7 papers, 287 citations indexed

About

Anna V. Agranovich is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna V. Agranovich has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 287 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 2 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine. Recurrent topics in Anna V. Agranovich's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). Anna V. Agranovich is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (3 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers). Anna V. Agranovich collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Germany. Anna V. Agranovich's co-authors include Antonio E. Puente, A. T. Panter, Pegah Touradji, Adam Kaplin, Ann M. Parker, Emily Brigham, Soo Yeon Kim, Martin B. Brodsky, Alison E. Turnbull and Konrad Schmidt and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Journal of Medicine, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine and Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

In The Last Decade

Anna V. Agranovich

7 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna V. Agranovich United States 6 111 78 72 69 59 7 287
Emi Bondi Italy 13 120 1.1× 165 2.1× 31 0.4× 95 1.4× 52 0.9× 28 452
Francesca Diolaiuti Italy 6 106 1.0× 208 2.7× 42 0.6× 42 0.6× 32 0.5× 10 324
Kayla A. Steward United States 10 64 0.6× 58 0.7× 72 1.0× 115 1.7× 17 0.3× 17 272
Sílvia Cañizares Spain 12 39 0.4× 79 1.0× 25 0.3× 90 1.3× 24 0.4× 23 368
Deborah Talamonti Canada 10 62 0.6× 179 2.3× 38 0.5× 59 0.9× 20 0.3× 12 341
G Gillett New Zealand 12 101 0.9× 38 0.5× 64 0.9× 34 0.5× 8 0.1× 42 392
Alberto Rodríguez‐Lorenzana Ecuador 10 27 0.2× 67 0.9× 90 1.3× 81 1.2× 5 0.1× 28 252
Mirian Santamaría‐Peláez Spain 9 71 0.6× 132 1.7× 12 0.2× 45 0.7× 18 0.3× 34 297
Robert B. Whitney United States 13 52 0.5× 61 0.8× 39 0.5× 67 1.0× 4 0.1× 22 398
Serggio Lanata United States 9 65 0.6× 38 0.5× 40 0.6× 178 2.6× 8 0.1× 25 322

Countries citing papers authored by Anna V. Agranovich

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna V. Agranovich's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna V. Agranovich with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna V. Agranovich more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna V. Agranovich

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna V. Agranovich. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna V. Agranovich. The network helps show where Anna V. Agranovich may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna V. Agranovich

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna V. Agranovich. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna V. Agranovich based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna V. Agranovich. Anna V. Agranovich is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Parker, Ann M., Emily Brigham, Bronwen Connolly, et al.. (2021). Addressing the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multidisciplinary model of care. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 9(11). 1328–1341. 111 indexed citations
2.
Brigham, Emily, Soo Yeon Kim, Michael Friedman, et al.. (2021). The Johns Hopkins Post-Acute COVID-19 Team (PACT): A Multidisciplinary, Collaborative, Ambulatory Framework Supporting COVID-19 Survivors. The American Journal of Medicine. 134(4). 462–467.e1. 30 indexed citations
3.
Puente, Antonio E., et al.. (2020). Cross-Cultural Comparison of Rural Healthy Adults: Russian and American Groups. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 36(3). 359–370. 7 indexed citations
4.
Agranovich, Anna V., et al.. (2020). The Culture of Time Inventory: Comparison of Time Attitudes Pertaining to Timed Testing in Russian and American Adults. Cross-Cultural Research. 55(2-3). 179–208. 3 indexed citations
5.
Dara, Chinar, Lindsey Kirsch‐Darrow, Anna V. Agranovich, et al.. (2012). Impaired emotion processing from vocal and facial cues in frontotemporal dementia compared to right hemisphere stroke. Neurocase. 19(6). 521–529. 28 indexed citations
6.
Agranovich, Anna V., A. T. Panter, Antonio E. Puente, & Pegah Touradji. (2011). The Culture of Time in Neuropsychological Assessment: Exploring the Effects of Culture-Specific Time Attitudes on Timed Test Performance in Russian and American Samples. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 17(4). 692–701. 45 indexed citations
7.
Agranovich, Anna V. & Antonio E. Puente. (2007). Do Russian and American normal adults perform similarly on neuropsychological tests?Preliminary findings on the relationship between culture and test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 22(3). 273–282. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026