Anna Schwartz
Impact in
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Papers in
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 3
- Surgery 1
- Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring 1
- Co-authors
- Anthony F. Pizon (2 shared papers)Carolyn J. Douglas (3 shared papers)Sabrina Cherry (3 shared papers)Deborah L. Cabaniss (3 shared papers)Daniel E. Brooks (1 shared paper)Tal Eyal (1 shared paper)Maya Tamir (1 shared paper)Jon C. Rittenberger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Clinical Toxicology (2 papers)Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (1 paper)The Journal of Infectious Diseases (1 paper)Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Anna Schwartz
8 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- General Psychology 5
- Clinical Psychology 57
- Applied Psychology 12
- Psychiatry and Mental health 29
- Parasitology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Schwartz
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schwartz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schwartz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schwartz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Schwartz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schwartz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schwartz. The network helps show where Anna Schwartz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Anna Schwartz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Clinical Manual | 1994 | 51 |
| 2 | 2008 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 31 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 29 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 20 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 18 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 3 |
About Anna Schwartz
Anna Schwartz is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Surgery, Social Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 8 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Cultural Differences and Values (1 paper), Social and Intergroup Psychology (1 paper), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (1 paper), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (1 paper), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (1 paper) and Eosinophilic Disorders and Syndromes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (5 citations), Clinical Psychology (57 citations), Applied Psychology (12 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (29 citations) and Parasitology (14 citations). Anna Schwartz has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Anthony F. Pizon, Carolyn J. Douglas, Sabrina Cherry, Deborah L. Cabaniss, Daniel E. Brooks, Tal Eyal, Maya Tamir, Jon C. Rittenberger, Matthew D. Krasowski and Mohamed A. Virji. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Toxicology, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, The Journal of Infectious Diseases and Critical Pathways in Cardiology A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.