Anna Schritz

24 papers receiving 608 citations

Peers

Anna Schritz
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 248
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 24
  • Biological Psychiatry 15
  • Physiology 92
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 42
Replace María Sánchez-Flores with:
María Sánchez-Flores Spain
Diego Marcos-Pérez Spain
Hirad Feridooni Canada
Bruno Mazzei Italy
Camilla Prete Italy
H. J. Cohen United States
Benjumin Hsu Australia
Jennifer MacDonald Canada
Jonas Peterson Sweden
Arseniy Yashkin United States
Anna Schritz relative to María Sánchez-Flores Spain María Sánchez-Flores's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
María Sánchez-Flores · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Schritz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Schritz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Schritz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Schritz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Schritz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Schritz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Schritz. The network helps show where Anna Schritz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Schritz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Schritz Line = papers co-authored together Anna Schritz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017204
2 201865
3 201964
4 201852
5 201747
6 201732
7 201726
8 202119
9 201817
10 202116
11 201614
12 202012
13 201611
14 201910
15 20205
16 20224
17 20194
18 20223
19
Nutzer und Nutzerinnen regionaler Demenznetzwerke in Deutschland: Erste Ergebnisse der Evaluationsstudie DemNet-D
20172
20 20202

About Anna Schritz

Anna Schritz is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 615 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (3 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (2 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (248 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (24 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations), Physiology (92 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (42 citations). Anna Schritz has collaborated with scholars based in Luxembourg, United Kingdom and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Saverio Stranges, Gloria Aguayo, Michèle Guillaume, Michel Vaillant, Anne‐Françoise Donneau, Daniel R. Witte, Laurent Malisoux, Oscar H. Franco, Laëtitia Huiart and Stephen Senn. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Endocrinology, British Journal of Cancer, Archives of Public Health, Medicine and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact