Anna Repo

1.8k total citations
35 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Anna Repo is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Mechanics of Materials and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Repo has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 10 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 10 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in Anna Repo's work include Forest Management and Policy (21 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (10 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (10 papers). Anna Repo is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (21 papers), Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (10 papers) and Bioenergy crop production and management (10 papers). Anna Repo collaborates with scholars based in Finland, Norway and Sweden. Anna Repo's co-authors include Jari Liski, Mikko Tuomi, Kyle Eyvindson, Mikko Mönkkönen, Pekka Vanhala, Raija Laiho, Daniel Burgas, Juha‐Pekka Tuovinen, Maiju Peura and Jussi Rasinmäki and has published in prestigious journals such as Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, The Science of The Total Environment and Global Change Biology.

In The Last Decade

Anna Repo

34 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Repo Finland 18 819 272 268 263 262 35 1.3k
Inge Stupak Denmark 21 673 0.8× 304 1.1× 214 0.8× 184 0.7× 313 1.2× 46 1.4k
Gustaf Egnell Sweden 23 958 1.2× 474 1.7× 334 1.2× 212 0.8× 440 1.7× 52 1.9k
Brian Titus Canada 21 770 0.9× 541 2.0× 291 1.1× 135 0.5× 242 0.9× 39 1.4k
Antti Kilpeläinen Finland 23 991 1.2× 638 2.3× 153 0.6× 297 1.1× 253 1.0× 73 1.6k
Évelyne Thiffault Canada 26 1.2k 1.5× 503 1.8× 367 1.4× 354 1.3× 408 1.6× 89 2.1k
Giuliana Zanchi Sweden 15 484 0.6× 188 0.7× 113 0.4× 251 1.0× 144 0.5× 28 833
Anssi Ahtikoski Finland 18 755 0.9× 424 1.6× 247 0.9× 114 0.4× 226 0.9× 68 1.1k
Eric Casella United Kingdom 23 592 0.7× 405 1.5× 140 0.5× 451 1.7× 552 2.1× 32 1.6k
T. W. Hudiburg United States 24 1.3k 1.6× 566 2.1× 92 0.3× 310 1.2× 344 1.3× 52 2.1k
César Pérez‐Cruzado Spain 22 461 0.6× 525 1.9× 98 0.4× 311 1.2× 189 0.7× 57 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Repo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Repo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Repo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Repo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Repo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Repo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Repo. The network helps show where Anna Repo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Repo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Repo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Repo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Repo. Anna Repo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mazziotta, Adriano, Kyle Eyvindson, Rémi Duflot, et al.. (2025). Assessing the impact of private forest owner preferences on the supply of ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management. 391. 126482–126482.
2.
Repo, Anna, et al.. (2024). Contrasting forest management strategies: Impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services under changing climate and disturbance regimes. Journal of Environmental Management. 371. 123124–123124. 4 indexed citations
3.
Peura, Maiju, Jaana Bäck, Jukka Jokimäki, et al.. (2022). Jatkuvapeitteisen metsänkäsittelyn vaikutukset luonnon monimuotoisuuteen, vesistöihin, ilmastoon, virkistyskäyttöön ja metsätuhoriskeihin. LaCRIS (University of Lapland). 2 indexed citations
4.
Viskari, Toni, et al.. (2022). Calibrating the soil organic carbon model Yasso20 with multiple datasets. Geoscientific model development. 15(4). 1735–1752. 14 indexed citations
5.
Vera, Ivan, Birka Wicke, Patrick Lamers, et al.. (2022). Land use for bioenergy: Synergies and trade-offs between sustainable development goals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 161. 112409–112409. 72 indexed citations
6.
7.
Viskari, Toni, et al.. (2021). The impact of calibrating soil organic carbon model Yasso with multiple datasets. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
8.
Repo, Anna, Kyle Eyvindson, Panu Halme, & Mikko Mönkkönen. (2020). Forest bioenergy harvesting changes carbon balance and risks biodiversity in boreal forest landscapes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 50(11). 1184–1193. 20 indexed citations
9.
Eyvindson, Kyle, et al.. (2019). Quantifying and easing conflicting goals between interest groups in natural resource planning. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 49(10). 1233–1241. 9 indexed citations
10.
Ziche, Daniel, et al.. (2018). Comparing soil inventory with modelling: Carbon balance in central European forest soils varies among forest types. The Science of The Total Environment. 647. 1573–1585. 12 indexed citations
11.
Seppälä, Jyri, Markku Kanninen, Timo Vesala, et al.. (2016). Metsien hyödyntämisen ilmastovaikutukset ja hiilinielujen kehittyminen. Jukuri (Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)). 1 indexed citations
12.
Repo, Anna, Anssi Ahtikoski, & Jari Liski. (2015). Cost of turning forest residue bioenergy to carbon neutral. Forest Policy and Economics. 57. 12–21. 17 indexed citations
13.
Repo, Anna, Hannes Böttcher, Georg Kindermann, & Jari Liski. (2014). Sustainability of forest bioenergy in Europe: land‐use‐related carbon dioxide emissions of forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy. 7(4). 877–887. 27 indexed citations
14.
Liski, Jari, Anna Repo, Mikko Tuomi, & Pekka Vanhala. (2013). Organic Chemical Characterization of Decomposing Plant Litter: A Comparison of Methods. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 44(22). 3310–3316. 2 indexed citations
15.
Liski, Jari, Sanna Kaasalainen, Pasi Raumonen, et al.. (2013). Indirect emissions of forest bioenergy: detailed modeling of stump‐root systems. GCB Bioenergy. 6(6). 777–784. 21 indexed citations
16.
Repo, Anna, Juha‐Pekka Tuovinen, Riina Antikainen, et al.. (2011). Forest bioenergy climate impact can be improved by allocating forest residue removal. GCB Bioenergy. 4(2). 202–212. 106 indexed citations
17.
Liski, Jari, Anna Repo, Pekka Vanhala, et al.. (2011). Metsäbiomassan energiakäytön ilmastovaikutukset Suomessa. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja. 2 indexed citations
18.
Tuomi, Mikko, Jussi Rasinmäki, Anna Repo, Pekka Vanhala, & Jari Liski. (2011). Soil carbon model Yasso07 graphical user interface. Environmental Modelling & Software. 26(11). 1358–1362. 103 indexed citations
19.
Repo, Anna, Mikko Tuomi, & Jari Liski. (2010). Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy. 3(2). 107–115. 182 indexed citations
20.
Tuomi, Mikko, Raija Laiho, Anna Repo, & Jari Liski. (2010). Wood decomposition model for boreal forests. Ecological Modelling. 222(3). 709–718. 141 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026