Anna Piela

795 citations
32 papers · 362 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Piela

30 papers receiving 332 citations

Peers

Anna Piela
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Communication 41
  • Philosophy 64
  • Gender Studies 46
  • Analytical Chemistry 42
  • Sociology and Political Science 168
Replace Graham Martin with:
Graham Martin United Kingdom
Aaron Winter United Kingdom
Paul Nixon United States
Dave McDonald Australia
Andrea O’Reilly New Zealand
Christel Manning United States
Fernando Luís Machado Portugal
Aparna Hebbani Australia
Erika Falk United States
Filiz Künüroğlu Türkiye
Anna Piela relative to Graham Martin United Kingdom Graham Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×29×
Graham Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Piela

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Piela's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Piela with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Piela more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Piela

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Piela. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Piela. The network helps show where Anna Piela may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Anna Piela, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Piela Line = papers co-authored together Anna Piela links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199654
2 201349
3 201335
4
Muslim Women Online: Faith and Identity in Virtual Space
201129
5 201028
6 201420
7 201615
8 202111
9 201311
10 201111
11 20109
12 20139
13 20158
14 20217
15 20217
16 20236
17 20206
18 20136
19 20155
20 20195

About Anna Piela

Anna Piela is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Education, Philosophy and Social Psychology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 362 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Islamic Studies and History (9 papers), Media, Religion, Digital Communication (7 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (6 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (6 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (3 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (3 papers) and Religious Education and Schools (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (41 citations), Philosophy (64 citations), Gender Studies (46 citations), Analytical Chemistry (42 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (168 citations). Anna Piela has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Katrina Roen, Elizabeth McDermott, Zenon Łukaszewski, Włodzimierz Zembrzuski, Joanna Krotofil, Hugh Busher, Nalita James, Janusz J. Petkowski, Emil Paluch and Bartosz Krajnik. Their work appears in journals such as Sociology of Religion, Nanotechnology, Sexuality Research and Social Policy, New Media & Society and Journal of the American Academy of Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact