Anna Palagyi

1.7k citations
65 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Palagyi

63 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Anna Palagyi
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Ophthalmology 378
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 133
  • Family Practice 34
  • Epidemiology 474
  • Emergency Medical Services 95
Replace Farah M. Chowdhury with:
Farah M. Chowdhury United States
Noel Hayman Australia
Bobby Paul India
J. M. Gill United States
Crayton A. Fargason United States
Amanda Tapley Australia
Janeth Leksell Sweden
R. Bhopal United Kingdom
Gareth John United Kingdom
Liang En Wee Singapore
Anna Palagyi relative to Farah M. Chowdhury United States Farah M. Chowdhury's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Farah M. Chowdhury · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Palagyi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Palagyi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Palagyi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Palagyi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Palagyi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Palagyi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Palagyi. The network helps show where Anna Palagyi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Palagyi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Palagyi Line = papers co-authored together Anna Palagyi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007127
2 2016104
3 200853
4 201950
5 200748
6 201546
7 201944
8 201841
9 202135
10 201635
11 201631
12 201629
13 201028
14 201728
15 201722
16 201921
17 200820
18 202120
19 201020
20 200818

About Anna Palagyi

Anna Palagyi is a scholar working on Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Ophthalmology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (21 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (16 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research (8 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (6 papers), Global Health Care Issues (6 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers) and Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (378 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (133 citations), Family Practice (34 citations), Epidemiology (474 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (95 citations). Anna Palagyi has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Ramke, Garry Brian, Rènée du Toit, Lisa Keay, Thomas Naduvilath, Richard I. Lindley, Jan Potter, Stephen Jan, Jessica Harper and Peter McCluskey. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Clinical and Experimental Optometry, BMJ Global Health, Ophthalmic Epidemiology and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact