Anna Nager

838 citations
41 papers · 555 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Nager

35 papers receiving 547 citations

Peers

Anna Nager
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 44
  • Biological Psychiatry 26
  • General Health Professions 205
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 19
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 157
Replace Patrick Chiu with:
Patrick Chiu Canada
Emanuela Resta Italy
Filiz Civil Arslan Türkiye
Annika Billhult Sweden
Alison Little United States
Kristin Phillips United States
Beatrice Kovasznay United States
Denise Shuk Ting Cheung Hong Kong
Tatiana Sadak United States
Silvia Paz Spain
Anna Nager relative to Patrick Chiu Canada Patrick Chiu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.2×
Patrick Chiu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Nager

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Nager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Nager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Nager more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Nager

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Nager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Nager. The network helps show where Anna Nager may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Nager, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Nager Line = papers co-authored together Anna Nager links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201861
2 201747
3 201943
4 201143
5 202140
6 202339
7 201638
8 201930
9 201824
10 201723
11 202119
12 201218
13 201615
14 202314
15 202212
16 201810
17 20209
18
[Distinguishing between depression and chronic fatigue syndrome].
20139
19 20178
20 20208

About Anna Nager

Anna Nager is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, General Health Professions, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 41 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (17 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (9 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (7 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (5 papers), Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (44 citations), Biological Psychiatry (26 citations), General Health Professions (205 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (19 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (157 citations). Anna Nager has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Hanna Sandelowsky, Björn Ställberg, Marie Åsberg, Ata Ghaderi, JoAnne Dahl, Anna Finnes, Pia Enebrink, Ingvar Krakau, Fariborz Mobarrez and Maria Wiklander. Their work appears in journals such as Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Scientific Reports, npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, Journal of Asthma and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact