Anna N. King
Impact in
-
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Aging top 10%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Papers in
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 4
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 2
- Photoreceptor and optogenetics research 2
-
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin 5
- Co-authors
- Amita Sehgal (3 shared papers)James S. Trimmer (2 shared papers)Colleen Manning (1 shared paper)Amita Sehgal (1 shared paper)Annika F. Barber (2 shared papers)Gang Wu (1 shared paper)John B. Hogenesch (1 shared paper)Renske Erion (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Molecular Biology of the Cell (1 paper)Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (1 paper)Nature Genetics (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaGermany
In The Last Decade
Anna N. King
10 papers receiving 359 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 130
- Aging 30
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 232
- Developmental Neuroscience 14
- Cell Biology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Anna N. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna N. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna N. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna N. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna N. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna N. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna N. King. The network helps show where Anna N. King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna N. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 68 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 48 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | Neural Circuits Controlling Circadian Rhythms | 2018 | 1 |
About Anna N. King
Anna N. King is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Molecular Biology, Cell Biology and Physiology, having authored 10 papers that have together received 360 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Circadian rhythm and melatonin (5 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (2 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (2 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (1 paper) and Dietary Effects on Health (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (130 citations), Aging (30 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (232 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (14 citations) and Cell Biology (41 citations). Anna N. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Amita Sehgal, James S. Trimmer, Colleen Manning, Amita Sehgal, Annika F. Barber, Gang Wu, John B. Hogenesch, Renske Erion, Stephanie Palacio and Daniel J. Cavanaugh. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Biology of the Cell, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, Nature Genetics, Current Biology and The Journal of Comparative Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.