Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Parasitology top 5%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Eufrosina Setsu UmezawaMaria Aparecida Shikanai‐YasudaFlávia Maia da SilvaMarta M. G. TeixeiraHugo CarrascoJosé Luis Ramı́rezAgustina RojasGladys Crisante
- Topics
- Trypanosoma species research and implications (20 papers)Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (8 papers)Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf
23 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Epidemiology 409
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 317
- Parasitology 103
- Insect Science 88
- Molecular Biology 49
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf. The network helps show where Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf. Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 31 | |
| 4 | 107 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | Eponymos chagas disease | 30 |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 40 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 33 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | Enhanced sensitivity of dot-immuno binding assay for the detection of antibodies in mice by the use of mild detergent extracted t. Cruzi antigens | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf
Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Parasitology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 24 papers that have together received 458 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Trypanosoma species research and implications (20 papers), Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (8 papers) and Synthesis and Biological Evaluation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (103 citations), Epidemiology (409 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (317 citations). Anna Maria Simonsen Stolf has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Paraguay and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include Eufrosina Setsu Umezawa, Maria Aparecida Shikanai‐Yasuda, Flávia Maia da Silva, Marta M. G. Teixeira, Hugo Carrasco, José Luis Ramı́rez, Agustina Rojas, Gladys Crisante, Néstor Áñez and Carlos Eduardo Pereira Corbett. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications and Journal of Parasitology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.