Anna M. Miller

1.2k total citations
19 papers, 979 citations indexed

About

Anna M. Miller is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna M. Miller has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 979 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 6 papers in Oncology and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Anna M. Miller's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (4 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). Anna M. Miller is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (4 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers). Anna M. Miller collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Anna M. Miller's co-authors include Victoria L. Champion, Joyce J. Repa, John M. Dietschy, Benny Liu, Stephen D. Turley, Dennis K. Burns, Stephen D. Williams, Qianqian Zhao, Patrick O. Monahan and David Cella and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Anna M. Miller

19 papers receiving 951 citations

Peers

Anna M. Miller
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Physiology 342
  • Oncology 275
  • Surgery 179
  • Molecular Biology 175
  • Reproductive Medicine 147
Giovanni Neri Italy
César A. Rodríguez Spain
Xavier Quantin France
James Carter United States
Irena Liphshitz Israel
Albert M. Bernath United States
Robert D. Morgan United Kingdom
Ewa Mrózek United States
H. Sperling Germany
Nicole McCarthy Australia
Giovanni Neri Italy View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Anna M. Miller
Anna M. Miller · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Anna M. Miller
Anna M. Miller · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Miller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Miller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Miller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Miller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Miller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Miller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Miller. The network helps show where Anna M. Miller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M. Miller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M. Miller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M. Miller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M. Miller. Anna M. Miller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1
Undergraduate nursing students knowledge and attitudes towards pressure injury prevention
3
2 18
3 2
4 3
5 30
6 141
7 318
8 18
9 8
10 127
11 38
12 16
13 1
14 113
15
Factors influencing effect of mammography screening in a university workplace.
12
16 34
17 52
18 1
19 44

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026