Anna M. Barker

643 citations
27 papers · 397 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anna M. Barker

21 papers receiving 392 citations

Peers

Anna M. Barker
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Medical Terminology 2
  • Health Information Management 32
  • General Health Professions 121
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 10
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 6
Replace L. Gordon Moore with:
L. Gordon Moore United States
Gemma Louch United Kingdom
Rasoul Tabari-Khomeiran Iran
Laura Hill United States
Susan Wilhelmsson Sweden
Pearl Treacy Ireland
Anthony Mazzarelli United States
Guus Munten Netherlands
Heather Brant United Kingdom
Cathy Catrambone United States
Anna M. Barker relative to L. Gordon Moore United States L. Gordon Moore's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.6×
L. Gordon Moore · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Barker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Barker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Barker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Barker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Barker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Barker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Barker. The network helps show where Anna M. Barker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna M. Barker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna M. Barker Line = papers co-authored together Anna M. Barker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018157
2 202242
3 201236
4 201429
5 201829
6 202219
7 202116
8 202415
9 20239
10 20237
11 20197
12 20226
13 20235
14 20214
15 20224
16 20224
17 20202
18 20242
19 20222
20 20241

About Anna M. Barker

Anna M. Barker is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental health and Health Information Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 397 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (2 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (1 paper) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (2 citations), Health Information Management (32 citations), General Health Professions (121 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (10 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (6 citations). Anna M. Barker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Vietnam and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barbara G. Bokhour, Gemmae M. Fix, Nora Mueller, Carol VanDeusen Lukas, Jeffrey Solomon, Sherri L. LaVela, Julie E. Volkman, Thomas K. Houston, Steven B. Zeliadt and Jamie H. Douglas. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Medical Care, Global Advances in Health and Medicine and Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact