Anna Lalik

24 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Anna Lalik
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Molecular Medicine 26
  • Cancer Research 40
  • Biomaterials 27
  • Molecular Biology 125
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 7
Replace Zhiwei Liu with:
Zhiwei Liu China
Abo Bakr Abdel Shakor Egypt
Serhii Vakal Finland
Maryam Pashaiasl Iran
Sanghee Lee United States
Juliana de Saldanha da Gama Fischer Brazil
Xia-Rong Wang China
Agata Gitlin‐Domagalska Poland
Shigeru Hisada Japan
Andrey S. Trulioff Russia
Anna Lalik relative to Zhiwei Liu China Zhiwei Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Zhiwei Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Lalik

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Lalik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Lalik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Lalik more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Lalik

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Lalik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Lalik. The network helps show where Anna Lalik may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Lalik, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Lalik Line = papers co-authored together Anna Lalik links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201540
2 202130
3 201927
4 201623
5 202023
6 200321
7 201319
8 202217
9 202215
10 202314
11 201810
12 202210
13 202310
14 202510
15 20037
16 20157
17 20157
18 20016
19 20195
20 20203

About Anna Lalik

Anna Lalik is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Medicine, Molecular Biology, Biomaterials and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 24 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include MicroRNA in disease regulation (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications (3 papers), Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (2 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (2 papers) and Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (26 citations), Cancer Research (40 citations), Biomaterials (27 citations), Molecular Biology (125 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (7 citations). Anna Lalik has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Ilona Wandzik, Agata Wawrzkiewicz–Jałowiecka, Joanna Rzeszowska‐Wolny, Sebastian Student, Graça Soveral, Ali Maruf, Mirosława Grymel, Jan Poleszczuk, Aleksandra Krzywon and Maria Wideł. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Biological Chemistry, Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics and Analytical Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact