Anna Krześlak
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Immunology top 5%
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Magdalena BryśEwa FormaAnna LipińskaPaweł JóźwiakHanna RomanowiczAndrzej BieńkiewiczKatarzyna Wójcik‐KrowirandaWaldemar Różański
- Topics
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (20 papers)Galectins and Cancer Biology (13 papers)Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- PolandUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Anna Krześlak
70 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Immunology 450
- Cancer Research 336
- Organic Chemistry 235
- Oncology 189
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Krześlak
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Krześlak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Krześlak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Krześlak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Krześlak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Krześlak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Krześlak. The network helps show where Anna Krześlak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Krześlak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Krześlak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Krześlak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Krześlak. Anna Krześlak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 64 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | Diagnostic value of glucose transporter 1 and 3 (GLUT1 and GLUT3) mRNA levelin postmenopausal women with urinary bladder cancer | 1 |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 216 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 89 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | Glycoproteins associated with nuclear matrix of higher Eucaryota | 1 |
About Anna Krześlak
Anna Krześlak is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Immunology, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (20 papers), Galectins and Cancer Biology (13 papers) and Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (336 citations), Immunology (450 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.0k citations). Anna Krześlak has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Magdalena Bryś, Ewa Forma, Anna Lipińska, Paweł Jóźwiak, Hanna Romanowicz, Andrzej Bieńkiewicz, Katarzyna Wójcik‐Krowiranda, Waldemar Różański, Katarzyna Starska and Chithra Keembiyehetty. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.