Caroline Struthers

636 total citations
7 papers, 284 citations indexed

About

Caroline Struthers is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Caroline Struthers has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 284 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Health Professions, 6 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Caroline Struthers's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). Caroline Struthers is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (4 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers). Caroline Struthers collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Caroline Struthers's co-authors include Anneliese Synnot, Jack Nunn, Chris Watts, Sophie Hill, Heather Goodare, Alex Pollock, Richard Morley, Pauline Campbell, Jacqui Morris and Patrícia Logullo and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Medical Research Methodology, Systematic Reviews and Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.

In The Last Decade

Caroline Struthers

7 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Caroline Struthers United Kingdom	5	150	47	40	31	27	7	284
Chris Watts United Kingdom	3	147 1.0×	45 1.0×	39 1.0×	28 0.9×	26 1.0×	3	270
Jim Elliott United Kingdom	9	269 1.8×	76 1.6×	27 0.7×	24 0.8×	15 0.6×	14	338
Junqiang Zhao Canada	12	198 1.3×	71 1.5×	27 0.7×	18 0.6×	22 0.8×	46	357
Jack Nunn Australia	8	241 1.6×	91 1.9×	57 1.4×	34 1.1×	31 1.1×	19	420
Yolanda Vaughn United States	6	136 0.9×	89 1.9×	23 0.6×	17 0.5×	20 0.7×	11	223
Louise Dudley United Kingdom	5	267 1.8×	76 1.6×	16 0.4×	36 1.2×	13 0.5×	8	327
Chinenye Anyanwu United States	3	149 1.0×	53 1.1×	15 0.4×	23 0.7×	20 0.7×	4	250
Anna Kearney United Kingdom	11	120 0.8×	141 3.0×	46 1.1×	12 0.4×	33 1.2×	25	378
Adrienne Alayli Germany	10	100 0.7×	44 0.9×	22 0.6×	9 0.3×	12 0.4×	25	211
MARY HORAN United States	6	87 0.6×	72 1.5×	33 0.8×	27 0.9×	59 2.2×	6	411

Countries citing papers authored by Caroline Struthers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caroline Struthers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caroline Struthers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caroline Struthers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caroline Struthers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caroline Struthers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caroline Struthers. The network helps show where Caroline Struthers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caroline Struthers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caroline Struthers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caroline Struthers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caroline Struthers. Caroline Struthers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Struthers, Caroline, et al.. (2025). There is no reliable evidence that providing authors with customized article templates including items from reporting guidelines improves completeness of reporting: the GoodReports randomized trial (GRReaT). BMC Medical Research Methodology. 25(1). 71–71. 2 indexed citations

Struthers, Caroline, et al.. (2021). GoodReports: developing a website to help health researchers find and use reporting guidelines. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 21(1). 217–217. 5 indexed citations

Logullo, Patrícia, Jennifer Anne de Beyer, Shona Kirtley, Caroline Struthers, & Gary S. Collins. (2020). Reporting guidelines should be free to publish, read, and use. Journal of Global Health. 10(2). 203107–203107. 3 indexed citations

Struthers, Caroline, et al.. (2020). Bias caused by reliance on patient-reported outcome measures in non-blinded randomized trials: an in-depth look at exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Fatigue Biomedicine Health & Behavior. 8(4). 181–192. 4 indexed citations

Pollock, Alex, Pauline Campbell, Caroline Struthers, et al.. (2019). Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 24(4). 245–255. 118 indexed citations

Pollock, Alex, Pauline Campbell, Caroline Struthers, et al.. (2018). Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review. Systematic Reviews. 7(1). 208–208. 117 indexed citations

Pollock, Alex, Pauline Campbell, Caroline Struthers, et al.. (2017). Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a protocol for a systematic review of methods, outcomes and effects. Research Involvement and Engagement. 3(1). 9–9. 35 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact