Anna K. Knuff

519 total citations
8 papers, 357 citations indexed

About

Anna K. Knuff is a scholar working on Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna K. Knuff has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 357 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Insect Science, 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Anna K. Knuff's work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). Anna K. Knuff is often cited by papers focused on Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (5 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). Anna K. Knuff collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and Bulgaria. Anna K. Knuff's co-authors include Thomas Asbeck, Marco Basile, Marlotte Jonker, Jürgen Bauhus, Julian Frey, Alexandra‐Maria Klein, Michael Staab, Ilse Storch, Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik and Nathalie Winiger and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Environmental Management and Environmental Research Letters.

In The Last Decade

Anna K. Knuff

8 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna K. Knuff Germany 8 207 188 181 97 86 8 357
Marlotte Jonker Germany 9 171 0.8× 173 0.9× 144 0.8× 93 1.0× 83 1.0× 10 322
Nathalie Winiger Germany 7 172 0.8× 142 0.8× 130 0.7× 86 0.9× 80 0.9× 11 303
Daniel Kraus Germany 9 286 1.4× 181 1.0× 187 1.0× 119 1.2× 107 1.2× 17 415
Alexa K. Michel Germany 5 306 1.5× 181 1.0× 205 1.1× 132 1.4× 113 1.3× 7 426
Berrit Kiehl Sweden 4 191 0.9× 217 1.2× 162 0.9× 103 1.1× 66 0.8× 5 342
Nicolas Debaive France 6 273 1.3× 145 0.8× 170 0.9× 83 0.9× 104 1.2× 11 342
Kevin B. Porter Canada 10 169 0.8× 271 1.4× 145 0.8× 241 2.5× 53 0.6× 16 409
Jan Volney Canada 5 230 1.1× 262 1.4× 204 1.1× 120 1.2× 60 0.7× 5 404
Christopher M. Oswalt United States 11 89 0.4× 180 1.0× 300 1.7× 178 1.8× 129 1.5× 18 433
Louis A. König Netherlands 5 137 0.7× 165 0.9× 115 0.6× 169 1.7× 41 0.5× 8 335

Countries citing papers authored by Anna K. Knuff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna K. Knuff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna K. Knuff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna K. Knuff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna K. Knuff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna K. Knuff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna K. Knuff. The network helps show where Anna K. Knuff may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna K. Knuff

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna K. Knuff. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna K. Knuff based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna K. Knuff. Anna K. Knuff is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Asbeck, Thomas, Francesco María Sabatini, Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik, et al.. (2021). Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 1625–1625. 41 indexed citations
2.
Basile, Marco, Thomas Asbeck, Marlotte Jonker, et al.. (2020). What do tree-related microhabitats tell us about the abundance of forest-dwelling bats, birds, and insects?. Journal of Environmental Management. 264. 110401–110401. 64 indexed citations
3.
Augustynczik, Andrey Lessa Derci, Thomas Asbeck, Marco Basile, et al.. (2020). Reconciling forest profitability and biodiversity conservation under disturbance risk: the role of forest management and salvage logging. Environmental Research Letters. 15(9). 0940a3–0940a3. 15 indexed citations
4.
Knuff, Anna K., Michael Staab, Julian Frey, et al.. (2020). Insect abundance in managed forests benefits from multi-layered vegetation. Basic and Applied Ecology. 48. 124–135. 50 indexed citations
5.
Knuff, Anna K., et al.. (2019). Plant composition, not richness, drives occurrence of specialist herbivores. Ecological Entomology. 44(6). 833–843. 11 indexed citations
6.
Gustafsson, Lena, Jürgen Bauhus, Thomas Asbeck, et al.. (2019). Retention as an integrated biodiversity conservation approach for continuous-cover forestry in Europe. AMBIO. 49(1). 85–97. 137 indexed citations
7.
Knuff, Anna K., Nathalie Winiger, Alexandra‐Maria Klein, Gernot Segelbacher, & Michael Staab. (2019). Optimizing sampling of flying insects using a modified window trap. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 10(10). 1820–1825. 31 indexed citations
8.
Knuff, Anna K., Elisabeth Obermaier, & Karsten Mody. (2016). Differential susceptibility and suitability of domestic and wild apple species for a florivorous weevil and its parasitoids. Journal of Applied Entomology. 141(4). 285–299. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026