Marlotte Jonker

475 total citations
10 papers, 322 citations indexed

About

Marlotte Jonker is a scholar working on Insect Science, Global and Planetary Change and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Marlotte Jonker has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 322 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Insect Science, 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 5 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Marlotte Jonker's work include Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). Marlotte Jonker is often cited by papers focused on Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (6 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). Marlotte Jonker collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Bulgaria. Marlotte Jonker's co-authors include Thomas Asbeck, Marco Basile, Anna K. Knuff, Jürgen Bauhus, Ilse Storch, Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Veronika Braunisch, Rasoul Yousefpour, Marc Hanewinkel and Nathalie Winiger and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Journal of Environmental Management and Forest Ecology and Management.

In The Last Decade

Marlotte Jonker

9 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers

Marlotte Jonker

GPC

IS

NLC

ECOLO

EEBS

Anna K. Knuff Germany

Nathalie Winiger Germany

Nicolas Debaive France

Petr Zasadil Czechia

Daniel Kraus Germany

Alexa K. Michel Germany

Tracy L. Fleming United States

Amelia J. Koch Australia

Janine Oettel Austria

Jacques Ibarzabal Canada

Anna K. Knuff Germany

Marlotte Jonker

188 ×1.1

GPC

207 ×1.2

IS

181 ×1.3

NLC

97 ×1.0

ECOLO

86 ×1.0

EEBS

Citations per year, relative to Marlotte Jonker Marlotte Jonker (= 1×) peers Anna K. Knuff

Countries citing papers authored by Marlotte Jonker

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marlotte Jonker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlotte Jonker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlotte Jonker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marlotte Jonker

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlotte Jonker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlotte Jonker. The network helps show where Marlotte Jonker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marlotte Jonker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marlotte Jonker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marlotte Jonker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marlotte Jonker. Marlotte Jonker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Basile, Marco, et al.. (2025). Testing the intermediate-disturbance hypothesis – managed roe deer populations are not disrupting forest faunal communities. Basic and Applied Ecology. 89. 1–12.

2.

Winiger, Nathalie, et al.. (2023). Bat habitat selection reveals positive effects of retention forestry. Forest Ecology and Management. 531. 120783–120783. 11 indexed citations

3.

Asbeck, Thomas, Francesco María Sabatini, Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik, et al.. (2021). Biodiversity response to forest management intensity, carbon stocks and net primary production in temperate montane forests. Scientific Reports. 11(1). 1625–1625. 41 indexed citations

4.

Jonker, Marlotte, et al.. (2021). The use of water-filled tree holes by vertebrates in temperate forests. Wildlife Biology. 2021(1). 16 indexed citations

5.

Basile, Marco, Thomas Asbeck, Marlotte Jonker, et al.. (2020). What do tree-related microhabitats tell us about the abundance of forest-dwelling bats, birds, and insects?. Journal of Environmental Management. 264. 110401–110401. 64 indexed citations

6.

Goßner, Martin M., et al.. (2020). Using sentinel prey to assess predation pressure from terrestrial predators in water-filled tree holes. European Journal of Entomology. 117. 226–234. 9 indexed citations

7.

Augustynczik, Andrey Lessa Derci, Thomas Asbeck, Marco Basile, et al.. (2020). Reconciling forest profitability and biodiversity conservation under disturbance risk: the role of forest management and salvage logging. Environmental Research Letters. 15(9). 0940a3–0940a3. 15 indexed citations

8.

Gustafsson, Lena, Jürgen Bauhus, Thomas Asbeck, et al.. (2019). Retention as an integrated biodiversity conservation approach for continuous-cover forestry in Europe. AMBIO. 49(1). 85–97. 137 indexed citations

9.

Koch, Hauke, et al.. (2011). Honeydew Collecting in Malagasy Stingless Bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) and Observations on Competition with Invasive Ants. African Entomology. 19(1). 36–41. 18 indexed citations

10.

Jonker, Marlotte, Willem F. de Boer, Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers, & Jasja Dekker. (2010). Foraging and Public Information use in Common Pipistrelle Bats (Pipistrellus pipistrellus): A Field Experiment. Acta Chiropterologica. 12(1). 197–203. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact