Anna Heino

912 citations
27 papers · 308 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Heino

23 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Anna Heino
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 129
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 160
  • Reproductive Medicine 47
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 131
  • General Health Professions 36
Replace Haywood L. Brown with:
Haywood L. Brown United States
Sabine F. van Voorst Netherlands
Shanna Cox United States
B.W. Mol Netherlands
Danielle B. Suchdev United States
Sarah McCarthy United States
Janet M. Townsend United States
Susanne Georgsson Sweden
Daghni Rajasingam United Kingdom
Lisa Allen Canada
Anna Heino relative to Haywood L. Brown United States Haywood L. Brown's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Haywood L. Brown · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Heino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Heino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Heino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Heino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Heino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Heino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Heino. The network helps show where Anna Heino may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Heino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Heino Line = papers co-authored together Anna Heino links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20243
3 20242
4 20236
5 20230
6 20232
7 20231
8 20230
9 20230
10 202312
11 20222
12 20225
13 20223
14 20223
15 20222
16
How reliable are health registers? Registration of induced abortions and sterilizations in Finland
20181
17 201742
18 201719
19 201611
20 201677

About Anna Heino

Anna Heino is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Reproductive Medicine and Health Information Management, having authored 27 papers that have together received 308 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Health and Contraception (5 papers), Congenital Anomalies and Fetal Surgery (4 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (3 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers), Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (3 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (2 papers) and Infant Development and Preterm Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (129 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (160 citations), Reproductive Medicine (47 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (131 citations) and General Health Professions (36 citations). Anna Heino has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mika Gissler, Dan Apter, Christian Fiala, Maarit Mentula, Maarit Niinimäki, Béatrice Blondel, Jennifer Zeitlin, Ewa Mierzejewska, Kari Klungsøyr and Helga Sól Ólafsdóttir. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, European Journal of Public Health, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Acta Paediatrica and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026