Anna Hagen-Thorn

595 total citations
7 papers, 436 citations indexed

About

Anna Hagen-Thorn is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Hagen-Thorn has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 436 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 3 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Anna Hagen-Thorn's work include Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers). Anna Hagen-Thorn is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (3 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers) and Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (2 papers). Anna Hagen-Thorn collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Lithuania and Iran. Anna Hagen-Thorn's co-authors include Kęstutis Armolaitis, Bengt Nihlgård, Ingeborg Callesen, Ingrid Stjernquist, Norbert Lamersdorf, Seyed Mohammad Hojjati and Iveta Varnagirytė–Kabašinskiene and has published in prestigious journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Trees and Annals of Forest Science.

In The Last Decade

Anna Hagen-Thorn

7 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Hagen-Thorn Sweden	6	212	169	118	113	99	7	436
Yuanguang Wen China	15	212 1.0×	213 1.3×	104 0.9×	138 1.2×	157 1.6×	40	513
M. P. Krishna India	4	141 0.7×	197 1.2×	98 0.8×	149 1.3×	106 1.1×	6	458
Per‐Olov Brandtberg Sweden	11	230 1.1×	189 1.1×	94 0.8×	119 1.1×	151 1.5×	13	473
Noreen Majalap‐Lee Malaysia	8	265 1.3×	220 1.3×	157 1.3×	122 1.1×	127 1.3×	11	527
Friderike Beyer Germany	14	266 1.3×	164 1.0×	173 1.5×	114 1.0×	196 2.0×	18	536
Leandra L Blevins Canada	11	271 1.3×	212 1.3×	95 0.8×	140 1.2×	213 2.2×	13	511
Marty Kranabetter Canada	3	195 0.9×	213 1.3×	78 0.7×	164 1.5×	154 1.6×	7	466
Kerstin Ahlström Sweden	10	186 0.9×	191 1.1×	142 1.2×	133 1.2×	162 1.6×	12	429
Takeo Mizoguchi Japan	12	121 0.6×	194 1.1×	146 1.2×	66 0.6×	117 1.2×	19	384
Teuvo Levula Finland	10	110 0.5×	180 1.1×	72 0.6×	125 1.1×	109 1.1×	17	433

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Hagen-Thorn

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Hagen-Thorn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Hagen-Thorn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Hagen-Thorn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Hagen-Thorn

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Hagen-Thorn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Hagen-Thorn. The network helps show where Anna Hagen-Thorn may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Hagen-Thorn

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Hagen-Thorn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Hagen-Thorn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Hagen-Thorn. Anna Hagen-Thorn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Hojjati, Seyed Mohammad, Anna Hagen-Thorn, & Norbert Lamersdorf. (2008). Canopy composition as a measure to identify patterns of nutrient input in a mixed European beech and Norway spruce forest in central Europe. European Journal of Forest Research. 128(1). 13–25. 20 indexed citations

2.

Hagen-Thorn, Anna, et al.. (2006). Autumn nutrient resorption and losses in four deciduous forest tree species. Forest Ecology and Management. 228(1-3). 33–39. 96 indexed citations

3.

Varnagirytė–Kabašinskiene, Iveta, et al.. (2005). Comparative study of litterfall in different deciduous species plantations. Laba (Lietuvos akademinių bibliotekų direktorių asociacija). 1 indexed citations

4.

Hagen-Thorn, Anna & Ingrid Stjernquist. (2005). Micronutrient levels in some temperate European tree species: a comparative field study. Trees. 19(5). 572–579. 22 indexed citations

5.

Hagen-Thorn, Anna, Kęstutis Armolaitis, Ingeborg Callesen, & Ingrid Stjernquist. (2004). Macronutrients in tree stems and foliage: a comparative study of six temperate forest species planted at the same sites. Annals of Forest Science. 61(6). 489–498. 58 indexed citations

6.

Hagen-Thorn, Anna, Ingeborg Callesen, Kęstutis Armolaitis, & Bengt Nihlgård. (2004). The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantations on former agricultural land. Forest Ecology and Management. 195(3). 373–384. 224 indexed citations

7.

Hagen-Thorn, Anna. (2004). The impact of six European tree species on the chemistry of mineral topsoil in forest plantations on former agricultural land. Forest Ecology and Management. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact