Anna H. Wu‐Williams
- Oncology
- Physiology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Thomas M. MackM C YuB. J. StoneWilliam J. BlotS. F. YuAbby G. ErshowElizabeth T. H. FonthamJonathan M. Samet
- Topics
- Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers)Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Anna H. Wu‐Williams
10 papers receiving 708 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Oncology 228
- Physiology 219
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 193
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 192
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 138
Countries citing papers authored by Anna H. Wu‐Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna H. Wu‐Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna H. Wu‐Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna H. Wu‐Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna H. Wu‐Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna H. Wu‐Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna H. Wu‐Williams. The network helps show where Anna H. Wu‐Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna H. Wu‐Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna H. Wu‐Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna H. Wu‐Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna H. Wu‐Williams. Anna H. Wu‐Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94 | |
| 2 | Lung cancer in nonsmoking women: a multicenter case-control study. | 83 |
| 3 | Environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer | 2 |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 255 | |
| 8 | 121 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | Life-style, workplace, and stomach cancer by subsite in young men of Los Angeles County. | 136 |
About Anna H. Wu‐Williams
Anna H. Wu‐Williams is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Physiology and Cancer Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 759 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (4 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (3 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (192 citations), Physiology (219 citations) and Oncology (228 citations). Anna H. Wu‐Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Thomas M. Mack, M C Yu, B. J. Stone, William J. Blot, S. F. Yu, Abby G. Ershow, Elizabeth T. H. Fontham, Jonathan M. Samet, Raymond S. Greenberg and Peggy Reynolds. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Cancer, International Journal of Epidemiology and Risk Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.