Anna Frackiewicz

673 total citations
9 papers, 532 citations indexed

About

Anna Frackiewicz is a scholar working on Genetics, Plant Science and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Frackiewicz has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 532 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Genetics, 5 papers in Plant Science and 4 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Anna Frackiewicz's work include Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers). Anna Frackiewicz is often cited by papers focused on Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities (3 papers). Anna Frackiewicz collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Anna Frackiewicz's co-authors include Patricia A. Jacobs, Marjorie Newton, Ann C. Chandley, Sheila Christie, P Edmond, Judy Fletcher, Newton E. Morton, Judith Fletcher, ELIZABETH B. ROBSON and P.J.L. Cook and has published in prestigious journals such as Cytogenetic and Genome Research, Clinical Genetics and Annals of Human Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Anna Frackiewicz

9 papers receiving 483 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Frackiewicz United Kingdom	9	390	209	200	185	91	9	532
B Quack France	13	396 1.0×	195 0.9×	250 1.3×	128 0.7×	57 0.6×	23	513
Marjorie Newton United Kingdom	7	280 0.7×	113 0.5×	179 0.9×	81 0.4×	71 0.8×	9	409
B Delobel France	11	313 0.8×	85 0.4×	170 0.8×	117 0.6×	60 0.7×	18	451
M. Codina‐Pascual Spain	11	256 0.7×	178 0.9×	175 0.9×	164 0.9×	95 1.0×	15	411
Vikram Jaswaney United States	7	424 1.1×	51 0.2×	245 1.2×	154 0.8×	60 0.7×	12	489
Joleen L. Zackowski United States	11	311 0.8×	105 0.5×	151 0.8×	107 0.6×	23 0.3×	13	379
Jean Pierre Siffroi France	16	483 1.2×	93 0.4×	387 1.9×	171 0.9×	376 4.1×	35	792
Geneviève Lefort France	13	262 0.7×	105 0.5×	148 0.7×	160 0.9×	22 0.2×	29	375
LuAnn Judis United States	7	180 0.5×	162 0.8×	310 1.6×	129 0.7×	46 0.5×	7	458
Elisabeth A. Keitges United States	11	439 1.1×	105 0.5×	249 1.2×	85 0.5×	35 0.4×	13	529

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Frackiewicz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Frackiewicz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Frackiewicz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Frackiewicz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Frackiewicz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Frackiewicz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Frackiewicz. The network helps show where Anna Frackiewicz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Frackiewicz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Frackiewicz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Frackiewicz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Frackiewicz. Anna Frackiewicz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Carothers, Andrew D., et al.. (1982). The effect of variant chromosomes on reproductive fitness in man. Clinical Genetics. 21(4). 280–289. 14 indexed citations

2.

Chandley, Ann C., P Edmond, Sheila Christie, et al.. (1975). Cytogenetics and infertility in man*. Annals of Human Genetics. 39(2). 231–254. 161 indexed citations

3.

Morton, Newton E., et al.. (1975). The effect of structural aberrations of the chromosomes on reproductive fitness in man. Clinical Genetics. 8(3). 159–168. 53 indexed citations

4.

Jacobs, Patricia A., et al.. (1975). The effect of structural aberrations of the chromosomes on reproductive fitness in man. Clinical Genetics. 8(3). 169–178. 63 indexed citations

5.

Jacobs, Patricia A., et al.. (1972). Incidence and mutation rates of structural rearrangements of the autosomes in man. Annals of Human Genetics. 35(3). 301–319. 59 indexed citations

6.

Chandley, Ann C., Sheila Christie, Judith Fletcher, Anna Frackiewicz, & Patricia A. Jacobs. (1972). Translocation heterozygosity and associated subfertility in man. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 11(6). 516–533. 63 indexed citations

7.

Jacobs, Patricia A., et al.. (1970). The inheritance of translocations in man: data from families ascertained through a balanced heterozygote. Annals of Human Genetics. 34(2). 119–136. 44 indexed citations

8.

Jacobs, Patricia A., et al.. (1970). Studies on a family with three cytogenetic markers. Annals of Human Genetics. 33(4). 325–336. 39 indexed citations

9.

Jacobs, Patricia A., M.J.W. Faed, Anna Frackiewicz, et al.. (1968). Pericentric inversion of a group C autosome: a study of three families. Annals of Human Genetics. 31(3). 219–230. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact