Anna E. Paul
Impact in
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer survivorship and care
Papers in
-
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies 13
- Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies 1
- Oncology 9
- Cancer survivorship and care 9
- Co-authors
- Holger Cramer (23 shared papers)Gustav Dobos (21 shared papers)Jost Langhorst (16 shared papers)Gustav J. Dobos (12 shared papers)Andreas Michalsen (12 shared papers)Silke Lange (11 shared papers)Romy Lauche (15 shared papers)Petra Klose (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- BMC Cancer (3 papers)Integrative Cancer Therapies (3 papers)Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2 papers)Trials (2 papers)Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustraliaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Anna E. Paul
40 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Complementary and alternative medicine 137
- Oncology 240
- Genetics 168
- Clinical Psychology 76
- Behavioral Neuroscience 4
Countries citing papers authored by Anna E. Paul
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna E. Paul's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna E. Paul with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna E. Paul more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna E. Paul
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna E. Paul. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna E. Paul. The network helps show where Anna E. Paul may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna E. Paul, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 181 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 146 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 87 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 84 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 83 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 46 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 35 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 33 | |
| 11 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 25 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 20 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2020 | 13 |
About Anna E. Paul
Anna E. Paul is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Oncology, Clinical Psychology, Genetics and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (13 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (9 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (4 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (3 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (2 papers), Dietary Effects on Health (2 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (1 paper) and Migraine and Headache Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (137 citations), Oncology (240 citations), Genetics (168 citations), Clinical Psychology (76 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (4 citations). Anna E. Paul has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Holger Cramer, Gustav Dobos, Jost Langhorst, Gustav J. Dobos, Andreas Michalsen, Silke Lange, Romy Lauche, Petra Klose, Rainer Lüdtke and Sherko Kümmel. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Cancer, Integrative Cancer Therapies, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Trials and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.