Anna Conte
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Safety Research top 5%
- Management Science and Operations Research top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Peter G. MoffattJohn D. HeyM. Vittoria LevatiFranz BuschaCarlo D’IppolitiFabrizio BottiMarco ScarsiniG Pappalardo
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (18 papers)Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Anna Conte
27 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- General Decision Sciences 170
- Economics and Econometrics 155
- Safety Research 108
- Management Science and Operations Research 43
- Sociology and Political Science 39
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Conte
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Conte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Conte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Conte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Conte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Conte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Conte. The network helps show where Anna Conte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Conte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Conte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Conte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Conte. Anna Conte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | El equilibrio de Nash | 0 |
| 9 | The Determinants of Decision Time | 1 |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | Endogenous variables in non-linear models with mixed effects: Inconsistence under perfect identification conditions? | 1 |
| 12 | The Role of Emotions on Risk Preferences: An Experimental Analysis | 2 |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | A Bivariate Ordered Probit Estimator with Mixed Effects | 1 |
| 17 | “THE PLURALISM OF FAIRNESS IDEALS”: A COMMENT | 2 |
| 18 | 98 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | Rana, formichiere o un milione di euro? Il caso “Affari Tuoi”. Un’analisi delle scelte in condizioni di incertezza in un esperimento naturale. | 1 |
About Anna Conte
Anna Conte is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 34 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (18 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (13 papers) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (170 citations), Safety Research (108 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (155 citations). Anna Conte has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter G. Moffatt, John D. Hey, M. Vittoria Levati, Franz Buscha, Carlo D’Ippoliti, Fabrizio Botti, Marco Scarsini, G Pappalardo, Fabrizio Maria Frattaroli and Daniela Di Cagno. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Econometrics, World Journal of Surgery and Economica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.