Anna Chapman

1.4k citations
53 papers · 882 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Chapman

45 papers receiving 825 citations

Peers

Anna Chapman
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 308
  • Pharmacy 81
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 121
  • Public Administration 32
  • Family Practice 20
Replace Deborah L. Burnet with:
Deborah L. Burnet United States
Marjorie K. Mau United States
Bjørg Karlsen Norway
Addie L. Fortmann United States
Wichit Srisuphan Thailand
Pey-Jiuan Lee United States
Jyu‐Lin Chen United States
Natalie Johnson Australia
Sonia Wutzke Australia
Min Hae Park United Kingdom
Anna Chapman relative to Deborah L. Burnet United States Deborah L. Burnet's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.7×
Deborah L. Burnet · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Chapman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Chapman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Chapman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Chapman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Chapman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Chapman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Chapman. The network helps show where Anna Chapman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Chapman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Chapman Line = papers co-authored together Anna Chapman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 53 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007189
2 2013149
3 201389
4 201071
5 201556
6 201648
7 200646
8 201632
9 201919
10 201817
11 201516
12 201613
13 201112
14 200312
15 200611
16 20089
17 20089
18 20207
19 20256
20 20096

About Anna Chapman

Anna Chapman is a scholar working on Public Administration, Pharmacy, Law, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 53 papers that have together received 882 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor Movements and Unions (11 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (8 papers), Discrimination and Equality Law (6 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (5 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (5 papers), Digital Economy and Work Transformation (5 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (5 papers) and International Labor and Employment Law (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (308 citations), Pharmacy (81 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (121 citations), Public Administration (32 citations) and Family Practice (20 citations). Anna Chapman has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Danielle Mazza, Susan Michie, Colette Browning, Stephanie Merkouris, Sean Cowlishaw, Hui Yang, Shane Thomas, Edward Janus, Annamari Kilkkinen and Tiina Laatikainen. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Frontiers in Public Health, BMC Public Health, The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific and Journal of Industrial Relations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026