Anna Bryden

492 total citations
7 papers, 381 citations indexed

About

Anna Bryden is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Bryden has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 381 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 2 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Anna Bryden's work include Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Public Health Policies and Education (2 papers). Anna Bryden is often cited by papers focused on Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Public Health Policies and Education (2 papers). Anna Bryden collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Belarus. Anna Bryden's co-authors include Mark Petticrew, Martin McKee, Bayard Roberts, Elizabeth Eastmure, Cécile Knai, Nicholas Mays, Ailie Robinson, Andrew Stickley, David Rotman and Christian Haerpfer and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Health & Place and Tobacco Control.

In The Last Decade

Anna Bryden

7 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Bryden United Kingdom	6	192	164	77	73	71	7	381
Robert Pryce United Kingdom	11	140 0.7×	150 0.9×	55 0.7×	42 0.6×	76 1.1×	32	298
Clive Henn United Kingdom	8	140 0.7×	245 1.5×	28 0.4×	50 0.7×	140 2.0×	15	394
Ru Quan You New Zealand	9	238 1.2×	327 2.0×	107 1.4×	43 0.6×	168 2.4×	10	524
Sérgio Duailibi Brazil	9	113 0.6×	166 1.0×	22 0.3×	93 1.3×	61 0.9×	13	344
Spencer Madden United Kingdom	2	153 0.8×	296 1.8×	20 0.3×	49 0.7×	164 2.3×	3	379
Julia Stafford Australia	12	101 0.5×	156 1.0×	11 0.1×	62 0.8×	47 0.7×	42	366
Abdallah Ally United Kingdom	8	143 0.7×	211 1.3×	47 0.6×	20 0.3×	128 1.8×	13	305
Orratai Waleewong Thailand	12	189 1.0×	209 1.3×	37 0.5×	29 0.4×	90 1.3×	34	328
Paula O’Brien Australia	10	89 0.5×	141 0.9×	8 0.1×	40 0.5×	58 0.8×	45	300
A.V. Nemtsov Russia	7	143 0.7×	316 1.9×	128 1.7×	46 0.6×	208 2.9×	27	539

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Bryden

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Bryden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Bryden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Bryden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Bryden

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Bryden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Bryden. The network helps show where Anna Bryden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Bryden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Bryden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Bryden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Bryden. Anna Bryden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Bryden, Anna, Bayard Roberts, Mark Petticrew, & Martin McKee. (2013). A systematic review of the influence of community level social factors on alcohol use. Health & Place. 21. 70–85. 92 indexed citations

2.

Bryden, Anna, Mark Petticrew, Nicholas Mays, Elizabeth Eastmure, & Cécile Knai. (2013). Voluntary agreements between government and business—A scoping review of the literature with specific reference to the Public Health Responsibility Deal. Health Policy. 110(2-3). 186–197. 63 indexed citations

3.

Roberts, Bayard, Andrew Stickley, Adrianna Murphy, et al.. (2012). Patterns of Public Support for Price Increases on Alcohol in the Former Soviet Union. Alcohol and Alcoholism. 47(4). 473–478. 5 indexed citations

4.

Roberts, Bayard, Andrew Stickley, Anna Gilmore, et al.. (2012). Knowledge of the health impacts of smoking and public attitudes towards tobacco control in the former Soviet Union. Tobacco Control. 22(6). e12–e12. 38 indexed citations

5.

Robinson, Ailie, et al.. (2012). Analysis of health stories in daily newspapers in the UK. Public Health. 127(1). 39–45. 34 indexed citations

6.

Petticrew, Mark, Elizabeth Eastmure, Nicholas Mays, Cécile Knai, & Anna Bryden. (2012). The Public Health Responsibility Deal: how should such a complex public health policy be assessed?. The Lancet. 380. S11–S11. 3 indexed citations

7.

Bryden, Anna, Bayard Roberts, Martin McKee, & Mark Petticrew. (2011). A systematic review of the influence on alcohol use of community level availability and marketing of alcohol. Health & Place. 18(2). 349–357. 146 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact