Anna Abel

703 total citations
7 papers, 401 citations indexed

About

Anna Abel is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Abel has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 401 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pharmacology, 5 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anna Abel's work include Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). Anna Abel is often cited by papers focused on Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (4 papers). Anna Abel collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Anna Abel's co-authors include Willem Kuyken, Adele M. Hayes, Glyn Lewis, Bill Jerrom, Laura Thomas, Nicola Ridgway, David Keßler, Katrina Turner, Chris Williams and Sandra Hollinghurst and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and The British Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Anna Abel

7 papers receiving 387 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Abel United Kingdom	7	169	145	140	94	70	7	401
Gemma D. Kok Netherlands	11	184 1.1×	119 0.8×	94 0.7×	83 0.9×	27 0.4×	14	342
Willemijn Scholten Netherlands	8	186 1.1×	186 1.3×	52 0.4×	105 1.1×	66 0.9×	15	403
Nic J. A. van der Wee Netherlands	9	159 0.9×	181 1.2×	43 0.3×	73 0.8×	119 1.7×	11	378
Alma M. Rae New Zealand	5	125 0.7×	167 1.2×	118 0.8×	55 0.6×	72 1.0×	6	327
Wendy Guyker United States	11	62 0.4×	234 1.6×	105 0.8×	69 0.7×	83 1.2×	24	447
Gerard D. van Rijsbergen Netherlands	10	185 1.1×	120 0.8×	92 0.7×	53 0.6×	32 0.5×	15	299
Mariëlle Hendriksen Netherlands	14	240 1.4×	312 2.2×	213 1.5×	77 0.8×	101 1.4×	19	539
Sabine Kech Germany	6	162 1.0×	160 1.1×	199 1.4×	80 0.9×	92 1.3×	8	356
Felicitas Rost United Kingdom	11	79 0.5×	211 1.5×	79 0.6×	83 0.9×	62 0.9×	23	384
Neil Nixon United Kingdom	9	135 0.8×	79 0.5×	48 0.3×	47 0.5×	45 0.6×	21	312

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Abel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Abel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Abel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Abel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Abel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Abel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Abel. The network helps show where Anna Abel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Abel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Abel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Abel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Abel. Anna Abel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

Andrews, Leigh A., Adele M. Hayes, Anna Abel, & Willem Kuyken. (2020). Sudden gains and patterns of symptom change in cognitive–behavioral therapy for treatment-resistant depression.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 88(2). 106–118. 10 indexed citations

Yasinski, Carly, et al.. (2019). Processes of change in cognitive behavioral therapy for treatment-resistant depression: psychological flexibility, rumination, avoidance, and emotional processing. Psychotherapy Research. 30(8). 983–997. 33 indexed citations

Abel, Anna, Adele M. Hayes, William Henley, & Willem Kuyken. (2016). Sudden gains in cognitive–behavior therapy for treatment-resistant depression: Processes of change.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 84(8). 726–737. 55 indexed citations

Kuyken, Willem, Shadi Beshai, Robert Dudley, et al.. (2015). Assessing Competence in Collaborative Case Conceptualization: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Collaborative Case Conceptualization Rating Scale (CCC-RS). Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy. 44(2). 179–192. 17 indexed citations

Hollinghurst, Sandra, Fran Carroll, Anna Abel, et al.. (2013). Cost-effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for treatment-resistant depression in primary care: economic evaluation of the CoBalT Trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 204(1). 69–76. 25 indexed citations

Wiles, Nicola, Laura Thomas, Anna Abel, et al.. (2012). Cognitive behavioural therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for primary care based patients with treatment resistant depression: results of the CoBalT randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 381(9864). 375–384. 236 indexed citations

Thomas, Laura, Anna Abel, Nicola Ridgway, et al.. (2011). Cognitive behavioural therapy as an adjunct to pharmacotherapy for treatment resistant depression in primary care: The CoBalT randomised controlled trial protocol. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 33(2). 312–319. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact