Anna A. Pendina

672 citations
40 papers · 400 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Anna A. Pendina

36 papers receiving 397 citations

Peers

Anna A. Pendina
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 93
  • Reproductive Medicine 87
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 147
  • Cancer Research 63
  • Urology 25
Replace Olga A. Efimova with:
Olga A. Efimova Russia
Amanda Wyman United States
Jacqui Detmar Canada
Stephanie Beall United States
Shu‐Chin Chien Taiwan
Dianne Vassmer United States
Feng-Tao Shi China
Lihong Pang China
Damyanti Bhardwaj Canada
Marco Mitidieri Italy
Anna A. Pendina relative to Olga A. Efimova Russia Olga A. Efimova's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Olga A. Efimova · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna A. Pendina

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna A. Pendina's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna A. Pendina with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna A. Pendina more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna A. Pendina

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna A. Pendina. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna A. Pendina. The network helps show where Anna A. Pendina may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna A. Pendina, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna A. Pendina Line = papers co-authored together Anna A. Pendina links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201954
2 201650
3 202033
4 201027
5 201726
6 201325
7 202321
8 201021
9 201421
10 201613
11 201810
12 20178
13 20238
14
[Peculiarities of metaphase chromosome methylation pattern in preimplantation human embryos].
20058
15 20047
16 20197
17
[Immunocytochemical analysis of human metaphase chromosome methylation status].
20057
18 20216
19 20156
20 20215

About Anna A. Pendina

Anna A. Pendina is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Reproductive Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 400 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (17 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (15 papers), Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence (6 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (6 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (6 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (5 papers) and Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (93 citations), Reproductive Medicine (87 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (147 citations), Cancer Research (63 citations) and Urology (25 citations). Anna A. Pendina has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, Germany and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Olga A. Efimova, В. С. Баранов, Andrei V. Tikhonov, Irina Fedorova, Аndrey S. Glotov, Alexander M. Gzgzyan, Т. В. Кузнецова, Elena S. Vashukova, Igor Yu. Kogan and Oleg S. Glotov. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Cytogenetic and Genome Research, Genes, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Biomedicines.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact