Ann Van den Bruel
- Infectious Diseases top 1%
- Epidemiology top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering top 5%
- Emergency Medicine top 1%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Frank BuntinxDavid MantBert AertgeertsMatthew ThompsonMariska LeeflangJonathan J DeeksRené SpijkerDevy Emperador
- Topics
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (19 papers)Emergency and Acute Care Studies (18 papers)SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (14 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBelgiumNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Ann Van den Bruel
126 papers receiving 5.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 171
- Infectious Diseases 1.5k
- Epidemiology 1.4k
- Biomedical Engineering 646
- Emergency Medicine 599
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 596
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Van den Bruel
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Van den Bruel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Van den Bruel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Van den Bruel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Van den Bruel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Van den Bruel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Van den Bruel. The network helps show where Ann Van den Bruel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Van den Bruel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Van den Bruel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Van den Bruel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Van den Bruel. Ann Van den Bruel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 260 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Ann Van den Bruel
Ann Van den Bruel is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Family Practice and Emergency Medicine, having authored 136 papers that have together received 5.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (19 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (18 papers) and SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (304 citations), Family Practice (185 citations) and Infectious Diseases (1.5k citations). Ann Van den Bruel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Frank Buntinx, David Mant, Bert Aertgeerts, Matthew Thompson, Mariska Leeflang, Jonathan J Deeks, René Spijker, Devy Emperador, Clare Davenport and Lotty Hooft. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.