Ann M. Fraser

456 total citations
11 papers, 354 citations indexed

About

Ann M. Fraser is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Ann M. Fraser has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 354 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 5 papers in Insect Science and 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Ann M. Fraser's work include Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers). Ann M. Fraser is often cited by papers focused on Plant and animal studies (8 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers). Ann M. Fraser collaborates with scholars based in United States, India and Sweden. Ann M. Fraser's co-authors include Wendy L. Mechaber, John G. Hildebrand, Rod Eastwood, Naomi E. Pierce, Sarah M. Gardner, Mark A. Elgar, Nina Wedell, Tom Tregenza, William R. Morrison and M R Johnson and has published in prestigious journals such as Oecologia, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment and Journal of Chemical Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Ann M. Fraser

10 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Ann M. Fraser

EEBS

GENET

IS

PS

CMN

Nehal Saleh United Kingdom

Jonathan G. Pattrick United Kingdom

Alcinda C. Lewis United States

Omar Bailez Brazil

Flore Mas New Zealand

D. J. R. Bruckner Germany

Stephen Takács Canada

Mark K. Stowe United States

W. M. Herrebout Netherlands

Tamara Pokorny Germany

Nehal Saleh United Kingdom

Ann M. Fraser

245 ×1.0

EEBS

180 ×1.1

GENET

125 ×0.8

IS

58 ×0.6

PS

21 ×0.5

CMN

Citations per year, relative to Ann M. Fraser Ann M. Fraser (= 1×) peers Nehal Saleh

Countries citing papers authored by Ann M. Fraser

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ann M. Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann M. Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann M. Fraser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ann M. Fraser

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann M. Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann M. Fraser. The network helps show where Ann M. Fraser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann M. Fraser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann M. Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann M. Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann M. Fraser. Ann M. Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Fraser, Ann M., et al.. (2025). Bee diversity in apple orchards of the Lower Himalaya: research synthesis, a new field study, and future needs. Journal of Pollination Ecology. 39. 213–240.

2.

Fraser, Ann M., et al.. (2024). Pollination deficit in apples increases with elevation. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 371. 109068–109068. 2 indexed citations

3.

Fraser, Ann M., et al.. (2022). Ecological livelihoods of farmers and pollinators in the Himalayas: Doing critical physical geography using citizen science. Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes. 67(1). 35–51. 2 indexed citations

4.

Morrison, William R., et al.. (2018). Evaluating Multiple Arthropod Taxa as Indicators of Invertebrate Diversity in Old Fields. The Great Lakes Entomologist. 45(1 & 2). 15 indexed citations

5.

Fraser, Ann M., et al.. (2015). Developing Research Skills Across the Undergraduate Curriculum. New Directions for Higher Education. 2015(169). 85–94. 9 indexed citations

6.

Fraser, Ann M., et al.. (2004). ANT DIVERSITY SAMPLING ON THE SOUTHERN CUMBERLAND PLATEAU: A COMPARISON OF LITTER SIFTING AND PITFALL TRAPPING. Southeastern Naturalist. 3(1). 113–126. 27 indexed citations

7.

Fraser, Ann M., Wendy L. Mechaber, & John G. Hildebrand. (2003). Electroantennographic and Behavioral Responses of the Sphinx Moth Manduca sexta to Host Plant Headspace Volatiles. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 29(8). 1813–1833. 137 indexed citations

8.

Fraser, Ann M., Tom Tregenza, Nina Wedell, Mark A. Elgar, & Naomi E. Pierce. (2002). Oviposition tests of ant preference in a myrmecophilous butterfly. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 15(5). 861–870. 23 indexed citations

9.

Fraser, Ann M., et al.. (2001). Assessing the quality of different ant species as partners of a myrmecophilous butterfly. Oecologia. 129(3). 452–460. 42 indexed citations

10.

Eastwood, Rod & Ann M. Fraser. (1999). Associations between lycaenid butterflies and ants in Australia. Australian Journal of Ecology. 24(5). 503–537. 77 indexed citations

11.

Gardner, Sarah M., et al.. (1982). The role of natural enemies in cereal aphid population dynamics. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact