Ann Hoskin-Mott
About
In The Last Decade
Ann Hoskin-Mott
3 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Molecular Biology 375
- Genetics 74
- Neurology 68
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 63
- Cell Biology 54
Countries citing papers authored by Ann Hoskin-Mott
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Hoskin-Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Hoskin-Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Hoskin-Mott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann Hoskin-Mott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Hoskin-Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Hoskin-Mott. The network helps show where Ann Hoskin-Mott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Hoskin-Mott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Hoskin-Mott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Hoskin-Mott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Hoskin-Mott. Ann Hoskin-Mott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48 | |
| 2 | 368 | |
| 3 | Correlation of the pilo-pupil ratio average, a new test for autonomic denervation, to the severity of diabetic retinopathy. | 6 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.