Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Effective Field Theory, Black Holes, and the Cosmological Constant
1999956 citationsAndrew G. Cohen, David B. Kaplan et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
New tools for low energy dynamical supersymmetry breaking
1996599 citationsMichael Dine, Ann E. Nelson et al.Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsprofile →
Low energy dynamical supersymmetry breaking simplified
1995588 citationsMichael Dine, Ann E. Nelson et al.Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsprofile →
The Minimal Moose for a Little Higgs
2002451 citationsNima Arkani–Hamed, Andrew G. Cohen et al.Journal of High Energy Physicsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann E. Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann E. Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann E. Nelson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann E. Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann E. Nelson. The network helps show where Ann E. Nelson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann E. Nelson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann E. Nelson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann E. Nelson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ann E. Nelson. Ann E. Nelson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nelson, Ann E., et al.. (2019). ASL Reverse Dictionary - ASL Translation Using Deep Learning. SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University). 2(1). 21.2 indexed citations
Nelson, Ann E. & Jakub Scholtz. (2015). Heavy flavor and dark sector. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(1).4 indexed citations
Nelson, Ann E. & Jonathan R. Walsh. (2008). Chameleon vector bosons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 77(9).25 indexed citations
9.
Nelson, Ann E.. (2006). Lattice calculations for Physics Beyond the Standard Model. Prepared for. 16.1 indexed citations
10.
Katz, Emanuel, Jae Yong Lee, Ann E. Nelson, & Devin G. E. Walker. (2005). A composite little Higgs model. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2005(10). 88–88.54 indexed citations
Arkani–Hamed, Nima, et al.. (2002). The Minimal Moose for a Little Higgs. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2002(8). 21–21.451 indexed citations breakdown →
Banks, Tom, Michael Dine, & Ann E. Nelson. (1999). Constraints on Theories With Large Extra Dimensions.40 indexed citations
16.
Cohen, Andrew G., David B. Kaplan, & Ann E. Nelson. (1999). Effective Field Theory, Black Holes, and the Cosmological Constant. Physical Review Letters. 82(25). 4971–4974.956 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Ambrosanio, S. & Ann E. Nelson. (1997). New Multi-Scale Supersymmetric Models with Flavor Changing Neutral Current Suppression.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.