Anke G. Posthumus

596 total citations
22 papers, 381 citations indexed

About

Anke G. Posthumus is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Anke G. Posthumus has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 381 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 8 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Anke G. Posthumus's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (5 papers). Anke G. Posthumus is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (9 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers) and Birth, Development, and Health (5 papers). Anke G. Posthumus collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Spain. Anke G. Posthumus's co-authors include Eric A.P. Steegers, Semiha Denktaş, Gouke J. Bonsel, Amber A. Vos, Adja J.M. Waelput, Peter Groenewegen, Maarten F. C. M. Knapen, Halleh Ghorashi, Gerard Borsboom and Erwin Birnie and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Environment International.

In The Last Decade

Anke G. Posthumus

22 papers receiving 373 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anke G. Posthumus Netherlands 11 190 136 130 90 77 22 381
Amber A. Vos Netherlands 11 202 1.1× 143 1.1× 160 1.2× 109 1.2× 114 1.5× 14 379
Johanna P. de Graaf Netherlands 12 297 1.6× 270 2.0× 167 1.3× 137 1.5× 84 1.1× 27 507
Melissa Gambatese United States 10 182 1.0× 162 1.2× 112 0.9× 83 0.9× 22 0.3× 17 381
Z.‐C. Luo Canada 7 281 1.5× 198 1.5× 166 1.3× 115 1.3× 165 2.1× 8 586
Jennifer E. Raffo United States 11 110 0.6× 105 0.8× 139 1.1× 99 1.1× 83 1.1× 21 326
Candace Mulready-Ward United States 8 169 0.9× 146 1.1× 51 0.4× 78 0.9× 29 0.4× 9 337
Évelyne Combier France 11 205 1.1× 89 0.7× 116 0.9× 47 0.5× 47 0.6× 26 388
Esther Feijen‐de Jong Netherlands 13 249 1.3× 257 1.9× 146 1.1× 145 1.6× 32 0.4× 41 500
Jennifer A. Ellis United States 9 75 0.4× 114 0.8× 78 0.6× 98 1.1× 46 0.6× 14 398
Elizabeth J. Conrey United States 13 208 1.1× 346 2.5× 121 0.9× 152 1.7× 35 0.5× 28 601

Countries citing papers authored by Anke G. Posthumus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anke G. Posthumus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anke G. Posthumus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anke G. Posthumus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anke G. Posthumus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anke G. Posthumus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anke G. Posthumus. The network helps show where Anke G. Posthumus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anke G. Posthumus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anke G. Posthumus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anke G. Posthumus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anke G. Posthumus. Anke G. Posthumus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rousian, Melek, et al.. (2025). Parental conditions, modifiable lifestyle factors, and first trimester growth and development: a systematic review. Human Reproduction Update. 31(3). 166–182. 2 indexed citations
2.
Steegers, Eric A.P., et al.. (2024). Tasks and responsibilities of clinical midwives in Dutch hospitals. Birth. 51(4). 806–816. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bakx, Pieter, Arie Franx, Hilmar H. Bijma, et al.. (2023). Patient-reported outcome and experience measures for quality improvement in pregnancy and childbirth care: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open Quality. 12(1). e001922–e001922. 9 indexed citations
4.
Jaddoe, Vincent W. V., et al.. (2023). Air Pollution Exposure During Pregnancy, Fetal Growth, And Pregnancy Outcomes at Birth. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bertens, Loes C.M., et al.. (2023). Type of deliveries supported by Dutch clinical midwives. Midwifery. 124. 103744–103744. 1 indexed citations
6.
Steegers, Eric A.P., et al.. (2023). Psychological distress during pregnancy and adverse maternal and perinatal health outcomes: The role of socioeconomic status. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 163(3). 920–930. 12 indexed citations
7.
Posthumus, Anke G., et al.. (2023). Exposure to outdoor residential noise during pregnancy, embryonic size, fetal growth, and birth outcomes. Environment International. 171. 107730–107730. 10 indexed citations
8.
Posthumus, Anke G., et al.. (2022). Maternal lipid profile in pregnancy and embryonic size: a population-based prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 22(1). 333–333. 8 indexed citations
9.
10.
Posthumus, Anke G., et al.. (2021). Maternal hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and early childhood cardiometabolic risk factors: The Generation R Study. PLoS ONE. 16(12). e0261351–e0261351. 3 indexed citations
11.
Steyerberg, Ewout W., et al.. (2020). Validation of a prognostic model for adverse perinatal health outcomes. Scientific Reports. 10(1). 11243–11243. 4 indexed citations
12.
Posthumus, Anke G., et al.. (2019). Satisfaction with obstetric care in a population of low-educated native Dutch and non-western minority women. Focus group research. PLoS ONE. 14(1). e0210506–e0210506. 15 indexed citations
13.
Vos, Amber A., Sabine F. van Voorst, Anke G. Posthumus, et al.. (2017). Process evaluation of the implementation of scorecard-based antenatal risk assessment, care pathways and interdisciplinary consultation: the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study. Public Health. 150. 112–120. 4 indexed citations
14.
Posthumus, Anke G., et al.. (2016). Effect of culturally competent educational films about prenatal screening on informed decision making of pregnant women in the Netherlands. Patient Education and Counseling. 100(4). 776–782. 16 indexed citations
15.
Posthumus, Anke G., Gerard Borsboom, Jashvant Poeran, Eric A.P. Steegers, & Gouke J. Bonsel. (2016). Geographical, Ethnic and Socio-Economic Differences in Utilization of Obstetric Care in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 11(6). e0156621–e0156621. 12 indexed citations
16.
Posthumus, Anke G., et al.. (2015). The Association of Ethnic Minority Density with Late Entry into Antenatal Care in the Netherlands. PLoS ONE. 10(4). e0122720–e0122720. 5 indexed citations
17.
18.
Posthumus, Anke G., et al.. (2014). Improving interprofessional coordination in Dutch midwifery and obstetrics: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 14(1). 145–145. 28 indexed citations
19.
Posthumus, Anke G., et al.. (2012). Adverse drug reaction-related admissions in paediatrics, a prospective single-centre study. BMJ Open. 2(4). e000934–e000934. 23 indexed citations
20.
Posthumus, Anke G., Adja J.M. Waelput, Amber A. Vos, et al.. (2012). Bridging Between Professionals in Perinatal Care: Towards Shared Care in The Netherlands. Maternal and Child Health Journal. 17(10). 1981–1989. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Amber A. Vos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Johanna P. de Graaf Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melissa Gambatese Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Z.‐C. Luo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer E. Raffo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Candace Mulready-Ward Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Évelyne Combier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Esther Feijen‐de Jong Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer A. Ellis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth J. Conrey
Rankless by CCL
2026