Anita Tusche
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies 10
- Face Recognition and Perception 4
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 4
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 4
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 6
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cultural Differences and Values 4
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 4
-
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 4
- Co-authors
- Tania SingerAnne BöcklerJohn–Dylan HaynesStefan BodeCendri A. HutchersonPhilipp KanskeFynn‐Mathis TrautweinPatrik Vuilleumier
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)Nature Communications (3 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Anita Tusche
21 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- General Decision Sciences 96
- Cognitive Neuroscience 709
- Applied Psychology 132
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 323
- Social Psychology 394
Countries citing papers authored by Anita Tusche
This map shows the geographic impact of Anita Tusche's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anita Tusche with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anita Tusche more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anita Tusche
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anita Tusche. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anita Tusche. The network helps show where Anita Tusche may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anita Tusche, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 61 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 67 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 137 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 186 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 107 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 63 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 80 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 28 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 161 |
About Anita Tusche
Anita Tusche is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (4 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (4 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (96 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (709 citations) and Applied Psychology (132 citations). Anita Tusche has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tania Singer, Anne Böckler, John–Dylan Haynes, Stefan Bode, Cendri A. Hutcherson, Philipp Kanske, Fynn‐Mathis Trautwein, Patrik Vuilleumier, Corrado Corradi‐Dell’Acqua and Boris C. Bernhardt. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.