Isabel Arend
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Kimron L. ShapiroRobert WardStephen J. JohnstonChristoph KleinAvishai HenikRobert D. RafalJuan BotellaAndrew J. Calder
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (18 papers)Multisensory perception and integration (10 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONEBrainScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Isabel Arend
45 papers receiving 815 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Cognitive Neuroscience 620
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 203
- Social Psychology 89
- Sensory Systems 60
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 55
Countries citing papers authored by Isabel Arend
This map shows the geographic impact of Isabel Arend's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isabel Arend with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isabel Arend more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Isabel Arend
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isabel Arend. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isabel Arend. The network helps show where Isabel Arend may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Isabel Arend
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Isabel Arend. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Isabel Arend based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Isabel Arend. Isabel Arend is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 47 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 40 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 73 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | Emotional load and the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain | 3 |
| 19 | Series de tres términos y modelos de representación | 4 |
| 20 | Emotional stimuli reduce the attentional blink in sub-clinical anxious subjects | 39 |
About Isabel Arend
Isabel Arend is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Statistics and Probability, having authored 46 papers that have together received 836 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (19 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (18 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (620 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (203 citations) and Sensory Systems (60 citations). Isabel Arend has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Kimron L. Shapiro, Robert Ward, Stephen J. Johnston, Christoph Klein, Avishai Henik, Robert D. Rafal, Juan Botella, Andrew J. Calder, Hadas Okon‐Singer and José Santacreu. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Brain and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.