Anıl Tuncel
About
In The Last Decade
Anıl Tuncel
6 papers receiving 77 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Cognitive Neuroscience 44
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 35
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 16
- Molecular Biology 10
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 8
Countries citing papers authored by Anıl Tuncel
This map shows the geographic impact of Anıl Tuncel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anıl Tuncel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anıl Tuncel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anıl Tuncel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anıl Tuncel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anıl Tuncel. The network helps show where Anıl Tuncel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anıl Tuncel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anıl Tuncel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anıl Tuncel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anıl Tuncel. Anıl Tuncel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.