Anika K. Josef
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rui MataRalph HertwigGregory R. Samanez‐LarkinTeresa M. KarrerEvan D. MorrisGert G. WagnerDavid RichterGero von Gersdorff
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers)Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyPsychological ScienceAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anika K. Josef
6 papers receiving 775 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Cognitive Neuroscience 257
- General Decision Sciences 242
- Applied Psychology 151
- Social Psychology 130
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 118
Countries citing papers authored by Anika K. Josef
This map shows the geographic impact of Anika K. Josef's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anika K. Josef with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anika K. Josef more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anika K. Josef
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anika K. Josef. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anika K. Josef. The network helps show where Anika K. Josef may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anika K. Josef
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anika K. Josef. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anika K. Josef based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anika K. Josef. Anika K. Josef is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25 | |
| 2 | 167 | |
| 3 | 179 | |
| 4 | 109 | |
| 5 | Age Differences in Risky Choice: A Meta-Analysis | 1 |
| 6 | 310 |
About Anika K. Josef
Anika K. Josef is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 791 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers) and Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (242 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (78 citations) and Applied Psychology (151 citations). Anika K. Josef has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Rui Mata, Ralph Hertwig, Gregory R. Samanez‐Larkin, Teresa M. Karrer, Evan D. Morris, Gert G. Wagner, David Richter, Gero von Gersdorff, Stefan Degenhardt and Kirsten Anding‐Rost. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Science and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.