Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The chemistry of isatins: a review from 1975 to 1999
2001791 citationsÂngelo C. Pinto et al.Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Societyprofile →
Biodiesel: an overview
2005529 citationsÂngelo C. Pinto, Jaílson B. de Andrade et al.Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Societyprofile →
The Role of Additives for Diesel and Diesel Blended (Ethanol or Biodiesel) Fuels: A Review
2007407 citationsÂngelo C. Pinto, Jaílson B. de Andrade et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ângelo C. Pinto
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ângelo C. Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ângelo C. Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ângelo C. Pinto more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ângelo C. Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ângelo C. Pinto. The network helps show where Ângelo C. Pinto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ângelo C. Pinto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ângelo C. Pinto.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ângelo C. Pinto based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ângelo C. Pinto. Ângelo C. Pinto is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Silva, Jefferson Rocha de Andrade, Cláudia M. Rezende, Ângelo C. Pinto, & Ana Cláudia F. Amaral. (2010). Cytotoxicity and antibacterial studies of iridoids and phenolic compounds isolated from the latex of Himatanthus sucuuba. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. 9(43). 7357–7360.19 indexed citations
13.
Pinto, Ângelo C., César Zucco, Jaílson B. de Andrade, & Paulo C. Vieira. (2009). Recursos humanos para novos cenários. Química Nova. 32(3). 567–570.6 indexed citations
14.
Pinto, Ângelo C.. (1995). O Brasil dos Viajantes e dos Exploradores e a Química de Produtos Naturais Brasileira. Química Nova. 18(6). 608–615.6 indexed citations
15.
Patitucci, Maria L., Valdir Florêncio da Veiga, & Ângelo C. Pinto. (1995). Utilização de Cromatografia Gasosa de Alta Resolução na Detecção de Classe de Terpenos em Extratos Brutos Vegetais. Química Nova. 18(3). 262–266.14 indexed citations
16.
Pinto, Ângelo C., et al.. (1990). Terpeniod Constituents from Vellozia Epidendroides. Química Nova. 13(1). 64–64.2 indexed citations
17.
Pinto, Ângelo C., et al.. (1986). 13 C NMR of Isopimarane Diterpenes. Part 4. Diterpenes from Vellozia patens. Química Nova. 9(3). 222–223.1 indexed citations
18.
Pinto, Ângelo C., et al.. (1985). Oxidative Cleavage of Diterpenic Glycols Jones Reagent. Química Nova. 8(1). 66–66.1 indexed citations
19.
Pinto, Ângelo C., et al.. (1985). RMN 13 C de Diterpenos com Esqueleto Cleistantano. Química Nova. 8(1). 7–13.6 indexed citations
20.
Pinto, Ângelo C., et al.. (1978). Constituintes quimicos de "Vellozia piresiana". Ciencia e cultura. 32. 125–127.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.