Angéline Jamet

995 citations
7 papers · 144 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Angéline Jamet

6 papers receiving 141 citations

Peers

Angéline Jamet
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 59
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 27
  • Emergency Medicine 24
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 71
  • Epidemiology 48
Replace Orlando Rubén Pérez‐Nieto with:
Orlando Rubén Pérez‐Nieto Mexico
Robert Plambeck United States
MC Blunt United Kingdom
Barbara Cortinovis Italy
A. Schellhaaß Germany
Nicolas Chudeau France
Valeria Raggi Italy
Cristiana Carollo Italy
W Hekman Netherlands
A Manfio Italy
Angéline Jamet relative to Orlando Rubén Pérez‐Nieto Mexico Orlando Rubén Pérez‐Nieto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×20×24×
Orlando Rubén Pérez‐Nieto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Angéline Jamet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Angéline Jamet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angéline Jamet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angéline Jamet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Angéline Jamet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angéline Jamet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angéline Jamet. The network helps show where Angéline Jamet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Angéline Jamet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Angéline Jamet Line = papers co-authored together Angéline Jamet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 201668
2 201447
3 201714
4 20167
5 20234
6 20154
7 20150

About Angéline Jamet

Angéline Jamet is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 7 papers that have together received 144 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nosocomial Infections in ICU (4 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Thermal Regulation in Medicine (1 paper), Diabetes Management and Research (1 paper), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (1 paper), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (1 paper) and Neurological and metabolic disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (59 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (27 citations), Emergency Medicine (24 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (71 citations) and Epidemiology (48 citations). Angéline Jamet has collaborated with scholars based in France and Canada. Frequent co-authors include René Robert, Rémi Coudroy, Jean‐Pierre Frat, Arnaud W. Thille, Philippe Petua, Delphine Chatellier, Séverin Cabasson, Véronique Goudet, Guillaume Louis and Francis Schneider. Their work appears in journals such as Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, Annals of Intensive Care, Journal of Nephrology, Intensive Care Medicine and Critical Care Explorations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact