Angela Spleen
Impact in
- Insect Science top 1%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
-
- Plant and animal studies
Papers in
-
- Plant and animal studies 4
- Genetics 4
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 4
- Co-authors
- Eugene J. Lengerich (7 shared papers)Karen Rennich (2 shared papers)Kathleen Lee (2 shared papers)Dennis vanEngelsdorp (2 shared papers)Michael Wilson (2 shared papers)Robert Snyder (2 shared papers)James Wilkes (2 shared papers)Dewey M. Caron (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Apicultural Research (3 papers)BMC Health Services Research (1 paper)The Journal of Rural Health (1 paper)Journal of Cancer Education (1 paper)Journal of College Student Psychotherapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Angela Spleen
8 papers receiving 620 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Insect Science 449
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 425
- Genetics 401
- Health 45
- General Health Professions 71
Countries citing papers authored by Angela Spleen
This map shows the geographic impact of Angela Spleen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angela Spleen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angela Spleen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angela Spleen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angela Spleen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angela Spleen. The network helps show where Angela Spleen may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Angela Spleen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 230 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 163 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 98 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 7 |
About Angela Spleen
Angela Spleen is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Insect Science, Surgery and Health, having authored 8 papers that have together received 643 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (1 paper), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (1 paper), Eosinophilic Esophagitis (1 paper) and Hepatitis B Virus Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (449 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (425 citations), Genetics (401 citations), Health (45 citations) and General Health Professions (71 citations). Angela Spleen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eugene J. Lengerich, Karen Rennich, Kathleen Lee, Dennis vanEngelsdorp, Michael Wilson, Robert Snyder, James Wilkes, Dewey M. Caron, Robin C. Vanderpool and Fabian Camacho. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Apicultural Research, BMC Health Services Research, The Journal of Rural Health, Journal of Cancer Education and Journal of College Student Psychotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.