Angel Belles
- Pollution top 5%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 5%
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Ocean Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Hélène BudzinskiClaire AlaryPatrick PardonYann AminotChristine FrankeJames W. ReadmanOlivier GeffardJérôme Cachot
- Topics
- Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (9 papers)Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers)Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomNorway
In The Last Decade
Angel Belles
18 papers receiving 454 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Pollution 240
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 237
- Analytical Chemistry 132
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 44
- Ocean Engineering 44
Countries citing papers authored by Angel Belles
This map shows the geographic impact of Angel Belles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Angel Belles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Angel Belles more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Angel Belles
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Angel Belles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Angel Belles. The network helps show where Angel Belles may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Angel Belles
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Angel Belles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Angel Belles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Angel Belles. Angel Belles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 33 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 99 | |
| 19 | Régression des herbiers de zostères dans le Bassin d’Arcachon : état des lieux et recherche des causes | 2 |
| 20 | El click de la Educación | 0 |
About Angel Belles
Angel Belles is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 20 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (9 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (6 papers) and Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (240 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (237 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (132 citations). Angel Belles has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Hélène Budzinski, Claire Alary, Patrick Pardon, Yann Aminot, Christine Franke, James W. Readman, Olivier Geffard, Jérôme Cachot, Justine Brune and Yannick Mamindy‐Pajany. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Environmental Pollution and Chemosphere.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.