Aneta Brzezicka
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Jan KamińskiAndrzej WróbelMateusz GolaMaciej KamińskiKatarzyna J. BlinowskaUeli RutishauserAdam N. MamelakMikołaj Magnuski
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (12 papers)
- Journals
- NeuronNeuroImageScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- PolandUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Aneta Brzezicka
46 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Cognitive Neuroscience 763
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 239
- Social Psychology 80
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 79
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 77
Countries citing papers authored by Aneta Brzezicka
This map shows the geographic impact of Aneta Brzezicka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aneta Brzezicka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aneta Brzezicka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Aneta Brzezicka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aneta Brzezicka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aneta Brzezicka. The network helps show where Aneta Brzezicka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aneta Brzezicka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aneta Brzezicka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aneta Brzezicka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aneta Brzezicka. Aneta Brzezicka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 43 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 59 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 48 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 25 | |
| 20 | 15 |
About Aneta Brzezicka
Aneta Brzezicka is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 49 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (15 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (13 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (763 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (239 citations) and Neurology (41 citations). Aneta Brzezicka has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jan Kamiński, Andrzej Wróbel, Mateusz Gola, Maciej Kamiński, Katarzyna J. Blinowska, Ueli Rutishauser, Adam N. Mamelak, Mikołaj Magnuski, Aleksandra Kroemeke and Grzegorz Sędek. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, NeuroImage and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.