Andrew W. Litt

2.3k total citations
26 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Andrew W. Litt is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew W. Litt has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 8 papers in Neurology and 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Andrew W. Litt's work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (4 papers). Andrew W. Litt is often cited by papers focused on Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers) and MRI in cancer diagnosis (4 papers). Andrew W. Litt collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Andrew W. Litt's co-authors include Glyn Johnson, Edmond A. Knopp, Soonmee Cha, David Zagzag, John L. Arnett, Meng Law, Stephan G. Wetzel, Irvin I. Kricheff, R S Pinto and D. Goldsher and has published in prestigious journals such as Stroke, Radiology and Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Andrew W. Litt

25 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Andrew W. Litt United States 15 1.0k 614 385 358 332 26 1.7k
Noriaki Tomura Japan 21 773 0.7× 311 0.5× 519 1.3× 611 1.7× 425 1.3× 118 1.9k
John P. Karis United States 22 1.8k 1.7× 850 1.4× 634 1.6× 373 1.0× 221 0.7× 57 2.8k
Clifford J. Eskey United States 22 536 0.5× 447 0.7× 330 0.9× 624 1.7× 356 1.1× 58 1.9k
Mark S. Shiroishi United States 24 1.3k 1.3× 756 1.2× 293 0.8× 272 0.8× 362 1.1× 92 2.4k
Hirohiko Kimura Japan 26 1.5k 1.4× 233 0.4× 321 0.8× 254 0.7× 240 0.7× 122 2.1k
Seung Chai Jung South Korea 29 1.1k 1.0× 690 1.1× 639 1.7× 500 1.4× 333 1.0× 99 2.3k
Thanh Nguyen Canada 18 825 0.8× 478 0.8× 190 0.5× 225 0.6× 218 0.7× 45 1.3k
Marlies Wagner Germany 23 530 0.5× 314 0.5× 438 1.1× 440 1.2× 328 1.0× 125 1.8k
Robert J. Sevick Canada 23 972 0.9× 414 0.7× 875 2.3× 853 2.4× 1.1k 3.4× 57 2.6k
Michael W. Hanson United States 20 644 0.6× 431 0.7× 172 0.4× 259 0.7× 160 0.5× 43 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew W. Litt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew W. Litt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew W. Litt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew W. Litt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew W. Litt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew W. Litt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew W. Litt. The network helps show where Andrew W. Litt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew W. Litt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew W. Litt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew W. Litt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew W. Litt. Andrew W. Litt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Watanabe, Alyssa T., et al.. (2024). Potential Impact of an Artificial Intelligence–based Mammography Triage Algorithm on Performance and Workload in a Population-based Screening Sample. Journal of Breast Imaging. 7(1). 45–53. 1 indexed citations
2.
Litt, Andrew W., et al.. (2005). Relative Procedure Intensity with Self-Referral and Radiologist Referral: Extremity Radiography. Radiology. 235(1). 142–147. 19 indexed citations
3.
Law, Meng, Soonmee Cha, Edmond A. Knopp, et al.. (2002). High-Grade Gliomas and Solitary Metastases: Differentiation by Using Perfusion and Proton Spectroscopic MR Imaging. Radiology. 222(3). 715–721. 413 indexed citations
4.
Cha, Soonmee, Edmond A. Knopp, Glyn Johnson, et al.. (2002). Intracranial Mass Lesions: Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Susceptibility-weighted Echo-planar Perfusion MR Imaging. Radiology. 223(1). 11–29. 386 indexed citations
5.
Cha, Sang-Hoon, Glyn Johnson, Andrew W. Litt, et al.. (2000). Dynamic contrast-enhanced T2-weighted MR imaging of recurrent malignant gliomas treated with thalidomide and carboplatin.. PubMed. 21(5). 881–90. 98 indexed citations
6.
Krinsky, Glenn A., Neil M. Rofsky, Jonathan Lebowitz, et al.. (1998). Gadolinium-Enhanced 3D MRA of the Aortic Arch Vessels in the Detection of Atherosclerotic Cerebrovascular Occlusive Disease. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 22(2). 167–178. 38 indexed citations
7.
Litt, Andrew W., et al.. (1996). MAGNETIC RESONANCE CAROTID ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE NECK: Clinical Implications. Neuroimaging Clinics of North America. 6(4). 863–874. 2 indexed citations
8.
Litt, Andrew W., et al.. (1996). Water Excitation MPRAGE MRI of VII and VIII Cranial Nerves. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 20(2). 194–200. 1 indexed citations
9.
Stevenson, Jeffrey S., Edmond A. Knopp, & Andrew W. Litt. (1995). MP‐RAGE subtraction venography: A new technique. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 5(2). 239–241. 30 indexed citations
10.
Feinberg, David A., Berthold Kiefer, & Andrew W. Litt. (1995). High Resolution GRASE MRI of the Brain and Spine. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 19(1). 1–7. 20 indexed citations
11.
Litt, Andrew W.. (1995). PREFACE. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 3(3). xv–xvi. 1 indexed citations
12.
Litt, Andrew W., et al.. (1995). MR ANGIOGRAPHY OF THE EXTRACRANIAL CAROTID ARTERIES. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 3(3). 439–454. 2 indexed citations
13.
Feinberg, David A., Berthold Kiefer, & Andrew W. Litt. (1994). Dual contrast GRASE (gradient‐spin echo) imaging using mixed bandwidth. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 31(4). 461–464. 14 indexed citations
14.
Oberfield, Sharon E., Lenore S. Levine, Ajax E. George, et al.. (1994). Altered cortisol response and hippocampal atrophy in pediatric HIV disease.. PubMed. 7(1). 57–62. 24 indexed citations
15.
Rofsky, Neil M., Jeffrey C. Weinreb, & Andrew W. Litt. (1993). Quantitative analysis of gadopentetate dimeglumine excreted in breast milk. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 3(1). 131–132. 59 indexed citations
16.
Litt, Andrew W., Richard S. Pinto, Thomas S. Riles, et al.. (1991). Diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of 2DFT time-of-flight MR angiography with contrast angiography in 50 patients.. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 12(1). 149–54. 105 indexed citations
17.
Kagetsu, Nolan J. & Andrew W. Litt. (1991). Important considerations in measurement of attractive force on metallic implants in MR imagers.. Radiology. 179(2). 505–508. 43 indexed citations
18.
Litt, Andrew W., et al.. (1991). Screening Protocol for MR Imaging of the Internal Auditory Canal. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 15(6). 930–933. 5 indexed citations
20.
Litt, Andrew W., et al.. (1990). Role of Slice Thickness in MR Imaging of the Internal Auditory Canal. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 14(5). 717–720. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026