Andrew Tucker
- Ecology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Murray W. JohnsKate CrowleyW. Lindsay ChaddertonAndrew R. MahonChristopher L. JerdeRobert E. ChapmanNatalie J. MichaelCraig E. Williamson
- Topics
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies (12 papers)Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (9 papers)Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Andrew Tucker
30 papers receiving 543 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Ecology 267
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 158
- Molecular Biology 148
- Social Psychology 98
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 96
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Tucker
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Tucker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Tucker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Tucker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Tucker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Tucker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Tucker. The network helps show where Andrew Tucker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Tucker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Tucker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Tucker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Tucker. Andrew Tucker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | Survival and vegetative regrowth of Eurasian and hybrid watermilfoil following operational treatment with auxinic herbicides in Gun Lake, Michigan | 5 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 32 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | An ocular measure of drowsiness and the eeg: changes with sleep deprivation | 1 |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | Monitoring the Drowsiness of Drivers: A New Method Based on the Velocity of Eyelid Movements | 3 |
About Andrew Tucker
Andrew Tucker is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Occupational Therapy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 566 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fish Ecology and Management Studies (12 papers), Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue (9 papers) and Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (158 citations), Ecology (267 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (96 citations). Andrew Tucker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Murray W. Johns, Kate Crowley, W. Lindsay Chadderton, Andrew R. Mahon, Christopher L. Jerde, Robert E. Chapman, Natalie J. Michael, Craig E. Williamson, Mark H. Olson and Kevin C. Rose. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Limnology and Oceanography and SLEEP.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.