Andrew Sharp
- Geography, Planning and Development top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Demography top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Paleontology top 10%
- Topics
- Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (6 papers)Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (3 papers)Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Andrew Sharp
24 papers receiving 191 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Geography, Planning and Development 127
- Sociology and Political Science 70
- Demography 52
- Political Science and International Relations 41
- Paleontology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Sharp
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Sharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Sharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Sharp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Sharp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Sharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Sharp. The network helps show where Andrew Sharp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Sharp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Sharp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Sharp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Sharp. Andrew Sharp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | The Treaty, the Tribunal and the law: recognising Maori rights in New Zealand | 1 |
| 9 | Justice and the Māori : Māori claims in New Zealand political argument in the 1980s | 18 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | An Ounce of Prevention: Rehabilitating the Anticipatory Nuisance Doctrine | 1 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | The journal of Jacob Roggeveen | 17 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | Adventurous Armada : the story of Legazpi's expedition | 1 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Ancient voyagers in the Pacific | 76 |
About Andrew Sharp
Andrew Sharp is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, History and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 28 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (6 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (3 papers) and Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (127 citations), Paleontology (39 citations) and Demography (52 citations). Andrew Sharp has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Colin Newbury, Ernest S. Dodge, Samuel Clyde McCulloch, John W. Webb and Cyril S. Belshaw. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Geographical Journal and Pacific Affairs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.